Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

The Indian Sociologist was founded by?

The Indian Sociologist was founded by? Correct Answer Shyamji Krishna Varma

  • The Indian Sociologist was founded by Shyamji Krishna Varma.
  • Shyamji Krishna Varma also founded the Indian Home Rule Society.
  • In 1905 he founded The Indian Sociologist.
  • The Indian Sociologist was an outlet for nationalist ideas.

Other prominent institutions formed during the British era are:

Institutes/Organisations Founded by Year
British India Association Dwarkanath Tagore 1852
Madras Native Association Gazulu Lakshminarasu Chetty 1852
East India Association Dadabhai Naoroji 1866

Related Questions

The journal, Indian Sociologist was founded by?
Consider the following statements in the context of the Indian Independence League. 1. It was a political organisation founded by Indian nationalists to foster Indian nationalism and obtain Japanese support for the Indian independence movement. 2. Founded in 1928, the organisation was located in various parts of South - East Asia. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Which of the following combinations of Indian revolutionaries abroad and their newspaper not correct? (A) Tarak Nath Das - Circular-e-Azadi (B) Ramnath Puri - Free Hindustan (C) Shyamji Krishna Verma - Indian Sociologist (D) Indubhushan Dey Mazumdar - Gaelic American Choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:
Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives.
Doing an internship at the University of Lille in France, I almost always found myself stuck whenever I had to speak to non-Indians about India or on anything'Indian'. This was more because of the subtle differences in the way the French understood India in comparison to what I thought was 'Indian'. For instance, when I,or any Indian for that matter, say 'Hindi' is an Indian language, what it means is that it is one of the languages widely spoken in India. This need not be similar tothe understanding that the French would have when they hear of 'Hindi' as an Indian language. Because for them Hindi then becomes the only language spoken inIndia. This is a natural inference that the French, Germans, Italians and many other European nationals would tend to make, because that is generally how it is intheir own respective countries. The risk of such inappropriate generalisations made about 'Indian' is not restricted to language alone but also for India's landscape,cuisine, movies, music, climate, economic development and even political ideologies. The magnitude of diversity of one European country can be easily compared tothat of one of the Indian State, isn't it? Can they imagine that India is one country whose diversity can be equated to that of the entire European continent? Theonus is upon us to go ahead and clarify the nuances in 'Indianness' while we converse. But why should one do so? How does it even matter to clarify? Why do some French people think that Hindi is the only Indian language?
Consider the following statements:
1. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code requires two persons whereas Section 149 of Indian Penal Code require five persons.
2. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code requires common intention, whereas Section 149 of Indian Penal Code requires common object
3. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 149 of Indian Penal Code both require presence of a prior consent
4. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and section 149 of Indian Penal Code. Both create specific offence
Which of the above statements are correct?
'The Indian Sociologist' journal published by?
Who started the newspaper "Indian Sociologist" abroad?
Who was the founder of journal named Indian Sociologist?
Name the Indian Sociologist who made important contribution to the study of social values.
Who was the editor of Indian Sociologist published from London?