Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

The doctrine of 'basic structure' emerged in the case of

The doctrine of 'basic structure' emerged in the case of Correct Answer Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala

The correct answer is Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala.

  • The doctrine of 'basic structure' emerged in the case of Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala.
    • This landmark decision of the Supreme court of India was in 1973.
    • It made preamble as a part of the Indian constitution.
    • The case was heard by the constitution bench of 13 Judges. 
    • The court concluded that the basic structure of the constitution can not be altered or destroyed by any of the constitutional amendments acts passed by the legislation.
    • "The Kesavananda Bharati Case: The untold story of a struggle for supremacy by Supreme Court and Parliament" is a book related to this case authored by T R Andhyarujina.
  • Golaknath vs State of Punjab was a case in 1967.
    • As a result of this case, the Supreme court ruled that Parliament can not pass any amendment which takes away the fundamental rights in the constitution.
  • A. K. Gopalan vs The State Of Madras was a case against the preventive detention act,1950.
    • It was the first major Article 21 case in India.
  • S. R Bommai vs Union of India case was in 1994.
    • This case was related to the provisions of Article 356 of the constitution of India.

Related Questions

Which of the following statement is correct? Answer using given below:
(1) Doctrine of indoor management apply in case of knowledge of irregularity in company.
(2) Doctrine of indoor management does not apply in case of suspicion of irregularity.
(3) Doctrine of indoor management apply in case of forgery.
(4) Doctrine of indoor management does not apply if the act of an officer of a company is one which would ordinarily be beyond the powers of such an officer.
Which of the following statements is/are correct?
1. When the court declares certain provisions of the Act as invalid and affects the validity of that Act, this principle is known as Doctrine of Severability.
2. It is the prospective character of Article 13(1) which gives rise to the Doctrine of Eclipse.
3. The American doctrine of waiver of Fundamental Rights is part of the Indian Constitution.
4. The doctrine of prospective overruling was not applied in I. C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab.
Matters pertaining to the validity of exercise of legislative power as distributed between the Union and the States under different lists are scrutinized with the help of which of the following principles?
1. Doctrine of Severability
2. Doctrine of Colourable Legislation
3. Doctrine of Eclipse
4. Doctrine of Pith and Substance
Select the correct answer:
Consider the following statements with reference to the Preamble to the Constitution. 1. The Preamble is a modified version of the Poorna Swaraj pledge of Indian National Congress. 2. The Preamble is neither a part of the basic structure of the Constitution nor a justiciable part of the Constitution. 3. The Supreme Court, in the KesavanandaBharati Case held that the Preamble can be amended subject to the doctrine of “Basic Structure of the Constitution”. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
The doctrine of 'Basic Structure of Constitution' emerged in which event?
Arrange the given words in the sequence in which they occur in the dictionary. 1. Basic industry 2. Basic pay 3. Basic rate 4. Basic plumage 5. Basic price
What is the printout of the following switch statement? char ch = 'a'; switch (ch){ case 'a': case 'A': System.out.print(ch); break; case 'b': case 'B': System.out.print(ch); break; case 'c': case 'C': System.out.print(ch); break; case 'd': case 'D': System.out.print(ch); }
What is the printout of the following switch statement?
char ch = 'a'; switch (ch){ case 'a': case 'A': System.out.print(ch); break; case 'b': case 'B': System.out.print(ch); break; case 'c': case 'C': System.out.print(ch); break; case 'd': case 'D': System.out.print(ch);}
The basic structure doctrine with regard to the Constitution of India relates to 1.the power of judicial review 2.the judgment in Kesavananda Bharati case (1973) 3.the constraints on Article 368 of the Constitution of India 4.the judgment in Golaknath case (1967) Select the correct answer using the code given below.
It has been said that the doctrine of 'precedent' is of antiquity while the doctrine of 'stare decisis' is relatively modem.
The emergence of the doctrine of 'stare decisis' was related to: