Which of the following is necessary for a treaty to be ratified?

Which of the following is necessary for a treaty to be ratified? Correct Answer It must be passed by the Senate by a two-thirds majority vote.

After a president (or his or her representatives) has negotiated a treaty, it must be ratified by the Senate before it takes effect. Ratification requires that the Senate approve the treaty by a two-thirds majority. The most famous example of a treaty NOT ratified by the Senate was the treaty negotiated by Woodrow Wilson ending World War I.
Bissoy MCQ

Related Questions

Which of the following statements are true?
(1) Minor's contract can be ratified on attaining majority.
(2) Minor's contract cannot be ratified on attaining majority.
(3) Minor's contract can be ratified jointly by both the parties to the contract.
(4) Minor is not liable under minor's contract.
(5) Minor's contract is an enforceable contract.
The treaty was ratified by the heads of states.
Consider the following statements.
1. The Treaty of Chushul ended the conflict between Sikhs and Tibetians.
2. The treaty marked a distinction between the borders of Ladakh and Tibet.
Which of the following is correct?
Consider the following statements
1. On 28th November, 1815, the Treaty of Sangauli was signed between Gurkha General Amar Singh Thapa and British Major General David Ochterlony.
2. Under this treaty, Gurkhas were allowed to return along with their private properties to Nepal.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
The . . . . . . . . treaty of . . . . . . . . was an arms control treaty in the sense that it regulated the acquisition of nuclear weapons.
The Treaty of London was a secret treaty to bring Italy into World War I.
The Treaty of Lausanne was the final treaty concluding World War I.
Consider the following statements.
To constitute abetment, it is:
1. Necessary that the act abetted must be committed
2. Not necessary that the act abetted must be committed
3. Necessary that the person abetted must have the same intention or knowledge as that of the abettor
Which of the statements given above represent(s) the correct position of law?
Consider the following statements:
To constitute abetmentit is
1. Necessary that the act abetted must be committed.
2. Not necessary that the act abetted must be committed.
3. Necessary that the person abetted must have the same intention or knowledge as that of the abettor.
Which of the statement given above represent(s) the correct position of law?
Read the following and give correct answer with the help of given below:
A married Hindu female can adopt a child
(1) Only with the consent of her husband.
(2) In case of void marriage, consent of husband is necessary.
(3) In case of voidable marriage, consent of husband is not necessary.
(4) If husband has converted to Muslim religion, his consent is not necessary.