Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Related Questions

There are four friends Sharayn, Pinky, Tanisha and Mamta. Two study in J college. one each in X college and A college. Each one is definitely good at one subject and one is good at all the subjects. The subjects are English, Science, Maths and Computers. Of those studying in J college, one is good at Maths and the other in all subjects. Tanisha is studying in Acollege. Pinky is good at Maths. Sharayn is not good at Science. Find who is good at all the subjects.
Good 'Y' is the substitute for good 'X' if
1. A fall in the price of good X leads to the fall in the marginal utility of good Y.
2. A fall in the price of good X leads to the fall in the quantity purchased of good Y. Select the correct answer
In the following question, somestatements is followed by some conclusions,you have to take the given statements to betrue even if they seem to be at variance with
commonly known facts and then decide whichof the given logically follow. Choose thatconclusion as the answer. Statements:
Some roads are not good.
Some railways are good.
All airways are good.
Some roads are bad. Conclusions:
I. At least some bad are good.
II. No bad is good.
Use the following passage for the questions based on it. Rahul and Kusum are good in Hindi and Maths, Sameer and Rahul are good in Hindi and Biology. Gita and Kusum are good in Marathi and Maths. Sameer, Gita and Mihir are good in History and Biology. Who is good in both Biology and Marathi? A. Gita B. Kusum C. Sameer D. Mihir
Ravi and Mohan are good in Hockey and Volleyball. Sachin and Ravi are good in Cricket and Baseball. Gaurav and Mohan are good in Hockey and Volleyball. Sachin, Gaurav, and Michael are good in Football and Baseball. Who are good in Hockey and Volleyball?
Ravi and Kunal are good in Hockey and Volleyball. Sachin and Ravi are good in Hockey and Baseball. Gaurav and Kunal are good in Cricket and Volleyball. Sachin, Gaurav and Mandeep are good in Football and Baseball. Who is good at Hockey, Cricket, and Volleyball?
A shopkeeper has 100 kg of good grade rice and x kg of bad grade rice. He brought good and bad grade rice for Rs. 20 and Rs. 10 respectively. He can sell the good and bad grade rice at Rs. 30 and Rs. 13.5 respectively. Out of x kg, if he mixes y kg of bad grade rice with good grade, he will get a profit of 69 2/7% from total sale. If he mixes y/2 kg of bad grade rice with good grade, he will get a profit of 57.5%. What is the profit he would have got if he sold honestly? (in rupees)
In the question below are given three statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: I. Some preparation are not good II. Only a few good are wise III. No wise is preparation Conclusions: I. Some good are not wise is a possibility II. No preparation is wise III. Some preparation are good is a possibility
In the question below are given three statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: I. Some preparation are not good II. Only a few good are wise III. No wise is preparation Conclusions: I. Many preparation are wise II. Some good are not wise III. Some wise are good
A' had only one good eye. He was employed by 'B' on a work in which some risk to the eye by injury was clear. However, the risk was not so great as to necessitate supply of protective goggles to the workmen with both eyes good. 'B' knew the fact that 'A' had only one good eye but did not supply protective goggles to 'A' because no other workman was supplied with protective goggles. During the course of employment, the good eye of 'A' was injured. 'A' brought an action in tort.