The Supreme Court laid down in . . . . . . . . that where the enterprise is engaged in hazardous or inherently dangerous activities and harm result to anyone on account of accident, the enterprise is strictly liable to compensate all those who are affected by such accident?

The Supreme Court laid down in . . . . . . . . that where the enterprise is engaged in hazardous or inherently dangerous activities and harm result to anyone on account of accident, the enterprise is strictly liable to compensate all those who are affected by such accident? Correct Answer M. C. Mehta v. Union of India

Related Questions

While dealing with the liability of an enterprise engaged in inherently dangerous activity, the Supreme Court laid down the rule of 'absolute liability' in-
A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court passes judgment in a matter. In a later case before a high court, a party presents the Supreme Court judgment as a binding authority. The opposing party claims that the high court is not bound by the Supreme Court's judgment because relevant provisions of law were not brought to the notice of the Supreme Court in that case. Which of the following is most correct in this case?
Principle: Article 141 of the Constitution provides that the law declared by the Supreme Court is binding on all courts within the territory of India.