Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

It is necessary under section 45 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, that the public notice as to the dissolution of the firm, be given by

It is necessary under section 45 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, that the public notice as to the dissolution of the firm, be given by Correct Answer Any of the partners

Related Questions

Consider the following for the dissolution of trade unions under the Trade Union Act, 1926. Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct?
1. When a registered Trade Union is dissolved, notice of the dissolution is signed by nine members and by the Secretary of the Trade Union.
2. The notice of dissolution must be sent within ten days to the Registrar.
3. Where the dissolution of a registered Trade Union has been registered and the rules of the Trade Union donot provide forthe distribution of funds of the Trade Union on dissolution, the registrar shall divide the funds amongst the members in such manner as may be prescribed.
Who amongst the following is not liable, in the absence of a public notice of dissolution, under section 45 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, after dissolution of the firm
Under section 45 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, if no public notice of the dissolution of the firm is given and a partner contracts in the name of the firm, which would have been within the implied authority of the partner
The Propositions are:
(1) Where a partner of a professional business partnership borrows money in the usual and regular course of business stating that the money is to be used for partnership business but misappropriates it, the other partners shall be liable.
(2) Where money has been borrowed by a partner without authority, but has been applied to the legitimate business needs of the firm, the firm is liable.
(3) Where the act is within the scope of the implied authority of a partner, but it has been done by him, to the knowledge of the third party, not for the firm but for his own purposes, the firm is liable.
Which of the following is true in accordance with Indian Partnership Act, 1932 as to the aforesaid propositions?
The changes in the constitution of the firm or dissolution of the firm, where the firm is a registered firm, under section 63 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, has to be notified to the Registrar by
A partner who has paid premium for admission into the partnership, in the premature dissolution of the firm, under section 51 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, is not entitled to refund of the premium if the dissolution is occasioned by
A', 'B' and 'C' are partners in a partnership firm named A, B & C. 'A' retires from the firm without giving any public notice. Thereafter, an existing creditor lends Rs. ten lakh to the firm on the basis of his knowledge that 'A', 'B' and 'C' are the three partners in the firm. This amount remains unpaid by the firm. The creditor wants to recover the unpaid loan amount from the firm.
A suit of a partnership firm to enforce any type of rights of the partnership firm is not maintainable unless the partnership firm is registered under Section 69 of the Partnership Act before the filing of the suit.
The dissolution by notice as described under section 43 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, is applicable where the partnership is
Which two classes use the Shape class correctly?
A. public class Circle implements Shape { private int radius; }B. public abstract class Circle extends Shape { private int radius; }C. public class Circle extends Shape { private int radius; public void draw(); }D. public abstract class Circle implements Shape { private int radius; public void draw(); }E. public class Circle extends Shape { private int radius; public void draw() { /* code here */ } }F. public abstract class Circle implements Shape { private int radius; public void draw() { /* code here */ } }