A Financial Institution institutes a suit for re-possession of a vehicle subject matter of Hire Purchase Agreement with the defendant and for recovery of hire charges. The Hire Purchase Agreement produced by the plaintiff along with the plaint contains an arbitration clause for reference of such claims to arbitration of a reputed named advocate. The court shall:

A Financial Institution institutes a suit for re-possession of a vehicle subject matter of Hire Purchase Agreement with the defendant and for recovery of hire charges. The Hire Purchase Agreement produced by the plaintiff along with the plaint contains an arbitration clause for reference of such claims to arbitration of a reputed named advocate. The court shall: Correct Answer Issue summons of the suit

Related Questions

In a suit for specific performance of an Agreement of Sale of immovable property the defendant along with his written statement files an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act for referring the parties to arbitration in accordance with arbitration clause contained in the Agreement to Sell. The plaintiff admits the existence of the arbitration clause as well as that the subject matter of suit is subject matter of such arbitration clause. The Court shall:
In a suit filed by the plaintiff, the defendant in his written statement has taken the objection of non-impleadment of necessary party. Despite such objection the plaintiff continued the suit and the suit finally was decreed. At the first appellate stage, the plaintiff withdraws the suit with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action and subsequently filed a fresh suit. The period spent by the plaintiff in the earlier suit, under section 14 of Limitation Act is
Where the plaintiff fails to pay the court-fee or postal charges or to present the copies of the plaint, for service of summons to the defendant, but the defendant appears in person, the suit of the plaintiff is liable to be
In a suit for money a decree is passed by consent whereby the defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff Rs. 35,000. It is further declared by the decree that the plaintiff should have a first charge on certain immovable property belonging to the defendant. Is the plaintiff entitled to have the property sold in execution of the decree without institution a regular suit for sale on the charge?