In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court has held that "The Arbitration and Conciliation Act", 1996 has been drafted according to the UNCITRAL model law. The Act and the model law are however not identical and therefore the judgements and the literature thereon cannot be taken as a guide to the interpretation of the Act, 1996:
In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court has held that "The Arbitration and Conciliation Act", 1996 has been drafted according to the UNCITRAL model law. The Act and the model law are however not identical and therefore the judgements and the literature thereon cannot be taken as a guide to the interpretation of the Act, 1996: Correct Answer Kokan RailwayCorp. Ltd vs. Rani Construction (P) Ltd.
মোঃ আরিফুল ইসলাম
Feb 20, 2025