Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

A suit, to challenge appointment of a person as arbitrator by the defendant on the ground of circumstances giving rise to justifiable doubt as to his independence or impartiality, by seeking a decree of declaration of such appointment as null and void, and of permanent injunction restraining arbitration proceedings, is:

A suit, to challenge appointment of a person as arbitrator by the defendant on the ground of circumstances giving rise to justifiable doubt as to his independence or impartiality, by seeking a decree of declaration of such appointment as null and void, and of permanent injunction restraining arbitration proceedings, is: Correct Answer Not maintainable

Related Questions

X' files a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction against 'Y' and files an application for temporary injunction under Order XXXIX, Rule 1(c), Code of Civil Procedure, The Court dismisses the application for temporary injunction. 2 months later, during the pendency of the suit, X again files for temporary injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1(c), Code of Civil Procedure, citing new facts and changed circumstances.
In a suit for permanent injunction against a defendant company, the Plaintiff sought an interim injunction restraining the defendant from prosecution the suit in a foreign court,
In a suit for specific performance of an Agreement of Sale of immovable property the defendant along with his written statement files an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act for referring the parties to arbitration in accordance with arbitration clause contained in the Agreement to Sell. The plaintiff admits the existence of the arbitration clause as well as that the subject matter of suit is subject matter of such arbitration clause. The Court shall:
A decree for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the possession of the Plaintiff, finding the possession of the Plaintiff to be settled, would operate as res judicata in a suit for partition filed by the Defendant for the same property.
To constitute a matter of res judicata which of the following conditions must concur?
1. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit or issue must be the same matter which was directly and substantially in issue either actually (section 11, explanation III) or constructively (section 11, explanation IV) in the former suit
2. The former suit must have been a suit between the same parties under whom they or any of them claim. Explanation VI of Section 11 must be read with this condition
3. The parties as aforesaid must have litigated under the same title in the former suit
4. The court which decided the former suit must have been a court competent to try the subsequent suit of the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised. Explanation II of section 11 is to be read with condition
5. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit must have been heard and finally decided by the court in the first suit. Explanation V of section 11 is to be read with this condition
Which of the following statements regarding powers granted under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, are correct?1. The application under Section 8 may be filed before the Arbitrator.
2. Section 8 is an instance of the least judicial intervention when there is an arbitration agreement between the parties.
3. When an application under Section 8 is filed before the court, the proceedings before the Arbitrator are stayed.
4. The application under Section 8 shall not be entertained unless it is accompanied by the original arbitration agreement.
Select the correct answer using the given below:
X sues A and B on a promissory note executed by A, B is A's nephew, and he is joined as a defendant on the ground that A and B are member of a joint Hindu family, and that the note was for a debt binding on the family. None of the defendant appears at the hearing and an ex parte decree is passed against both the defendants.
The decree against A proceeds on the ground that the note was passed by him and against B on the ground that the debt was incurred for a family purpose. B applies for an order to set aside the decree, alleging that the summons was not served upon him and that the debt in respect of which the note was passed by A was not incurred for a family purpose. It is not disputed that the amount was actually advanced to A.
Consider the following propositions:
1. A void marriage remains valid until a decree annulling it has been passed by a competent court.
2. A void marriage is never a valid marriage and there is no necessity of any decree annulling it.
3. A voidable marriage remains valid until a decree annulling it has been passed by a competent court.
4. Children born out of void marriage will get legal protection under section 16 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on the basis of decree of nullity of such marriage.
Choose the correct option from below:
Can a court pass a decree in a suit seeking rights in an immovable property where a defendant has transferred his interest and rights in the suit property to a third person without issue of summons/notice to the third person? If yes, whether the decree will be binding against the transferee pendente life.
In a suit for recovery of Rs. 25 lakh, the Defendant files its written statement and pleads that it does not owe any money to the Plaintiff but in fact, it is entitled to recover the sum of Rs. 40 lakh from the Plaintiff. The Defendant, however, does not file a counter claim. Can the Defendant file the counter claim at a subsequent stage in the suit or file a fresh suit seeking recovery of Rs, 40 lakhs?