Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

For the purpose of Limitation Act, a suit is instituted:
(1) in an ordinary case, when the plaint is presented to the proper officer
(2) in the case of a pauper when his application for leave to sue as a pauper is made
(3) in the case of a claim against a company which is being wound-up by the Court when the claimant first sends in the claim to the official liquidator
Which of the above are correct?

For the purpose of Limitation Act, a suit is instituted:
(1) in an ordinary case, when the plaint is presented to the proper officer
(2) in the case of a pauper when his application for leave to sue as a pauper is made
(3) in the case of a claim against a company which is being wound-up by the Court when the claimant first sends in the claim to the official liquidator
Which of the above are correct? Correct Answer All of these

Related Questions

To constitute a matter of res judicata which of the following conditions must concur?
1. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit or issue must be the same matter which was directly and substantially in issue either actually (section 11, explanation III) or constructively (section 11, explanation IV) in the former suit
2. The former suit must have been a suit between the same parties under whom they or any of them claim. Explanation VI of Section 11 must be read with this condition
3. The parties as aforesaid must have litigated under the same title in the former suit
4. The court which decided the former suit must have been a court competent to try the subsequent suit of the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised. Explanation II of section 11 is to be read with condition
5. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit must have been heard and finally decided by the court in the first suit. Explanation V of section 11 is to be read with this condition
On the last day of the period of limitation prescribed for the institution of a suit, A applies for leave to sue as a pauper. The application is heard a fortnight later. It transpires at the hearing of the application that A was possessed of sufficient means to enable him to pay the Court-fees. Before an order is made under this rule rejecting the application, A pays the necessary Court-fees, and the application is thereupon converted into a plaint.
Which of the following instances of order are decrees?
1. An order rejecting an application for leave to sue in forma pauperis for no suit has till then been filed
2. An order refusing leave to institute for accounts of religious endowment
3. An order under the Indian Trusts Act, 1882 dismissing an application for the removal of trustee
4. An order on a settlement case under section 104 (2) of the Bengal Tenancy Act 3 of 1898 as the proceeding is instituted not by a plaint but by an application
5. An order made on an application to the District Court under section 84 (2) of the Madras Religious Endowments Act 2 of 1927
Assertion (A): Where any special or local law prescribes for any suit appeal or application a period of limitation different from period prescribed by the Schedule, the provisions of Section 3 of Limitation Act, 1963 shall apply as if such period were the period prescribed by the schedule.
Reason (R): Where a Special Law prescribes a period of limitation for filing appeal but there is no provision therefore under Limitation Act, 1963, the period of limitation provided under the Special Law must be treated to be different from that under the Limitation Act.
There are six persons namely A, B, C, D, E and F. They all take leave from office on any one day of the week starting from Monday to Saturday. Only one person takes leave on one day. C is the first person to take a leave. Three persons take leave between D and C. F takes leave just after D. E takes leave on Wednesday. B takes a leave after A. Who takes a leave on Thursday?
Five delegates P, Q, R, S and T are forwarding their files to one another. P sends his file to Q, S and T, T sends his files to R while P and R exchange their files with each other. Q sends his file to S who sends his files to T. If P has to forward his files to R, then in how many ways P can forward files to R?
Consider the following statements:
1. Where the High Court calls for the record of any case in its revisional jurisdiction, it operates as a stay of such case before the subordinate court.
2. No second appeal shall lie in money suits where the value of the subject matter does not exceed Rs. 25,000.
3. A plaintiff cannot be allowed by the court to sue afterwards for any relief omitted by him in the suit.
4. A plaintiff may relinquish any portion of his claim in order to bring the suit within the jurisdiction of any court.
Of the above statements:
Following are the shortilisting criteria for a candidates to be called for Interview for the post of Deputy Manager in an Insurance company. The candidate must (i) be at least 30 years and not more than 35 years as on 1st January, 2020. (ii) be a graduate in any discipline. (iii) have done MBA with specialisation in insurance with at least 75% marks. (iv)have at least one year post qualification work experience in an insurance company. (v) have secured at least 60% of marks in the screening test conducted by the company. (vi) a native of Maharashtra. However, if the applicant fulfills the above mentioned criteria except a) at (iv) above, the case may be referred to the General Manager of the company. b) at (v) above, the case may be referred to the Chief Manager of the company. c) at (vi) above but has studied Marathi as one subject in class 10, his case will be referred to Divisional Manager of the company. Rekha Kesharwani is 32 years old as on 1st Jan 2020. She has done B.Sc. from a university in Uttar Pradesh. She has done her post graduation in Business administration with a specialisation of Insurance from a reputed institute at Pune in 2016. She has scored 75% marks in the screening test conducted by the company. She is working as a development officer in LIC of India. What decision about Rekha Kesharwani can be taken on the basis of the information given above?
In a contractual dispute between two parties A and B, A files a suit in New Delhi where the cause of action arose. Two days later, B files a suit in the same matter in Mumbai, where A is resident. The pendency of the first suit is not brought to the notice of the court in Mumbai. The court pronounces judgement in second suit before the first suit is decided. Would such decision operate as a bar on the court in New Delhi to try the suit any further?
A file a suit against B to recover possession of a house. He values his claim in the plaint at Rs. 8,000. The suit is filed in court C, which has jurisdiction to try the suit of a value upto Rs. 10,000. The market value of the house is Rs. 12,000 but B does not object to the jurisdiction of the court. The decree is passed in favour of A