Recovery of specific immovable property may be made under Section 5 of the Specific Relief Act, according to the

Limitation to file suit for recovery of specific immovable property under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act is . . . . . . . .

A

Three years

B

Six months

C

Twelve years

D

One year

Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act a suit for recovery of possession of immovable property may be brought within . . . . . . . . from the date of dispossession

A

6 Months

B

3 Months

C

1 Year

D

3 Years

A suit for recovery of possession of any immovable property under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act can be filed against:

A

A private individual only

B

A government

C

Both (A) and (B)

D

Neither (A) nor (B)

A person is dispossessed of his immovable property without due course of law. In what period can he bring a suit for recovery of possession under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963?

A

Three months

B

Six months

C

Nine months

D

One year

What is the time limit for filing suit for recovery of possession of immovable property under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act?

A

1 year from dispossession

B

6 months from dispossession

C

3 months from dispossession

D

No time limit is prescribed

The suit for recovery of possession of an immovable property under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act can be filed against:

A

A private individual

B

The Government

C

Private individual and the Government

D

None of the above

Assertion (A): Where immovable property of one person is by an act of parties made security for payment of money to another and the transaction does not amount to Mortgage, the later person is said to have a charge on the property.
Reason (R): Any contract in respect of immovable property, of itself, creates a charge on such property.

A

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is correct explanation of (A)

B

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is not correct explanation of (A)

C

(A) is true but (R) is false

D

(A) is false but (R) is true

Which of the following Sections of Specific Relief Act deals with recovery of specific immovable property?

A

Section 3

B

Section 4

C

Section 5

D

Section 6

In a suit for recovery of possession by a person dispossessed of possession of immovable property under the Specific Relief Act, which one is not the essential requirement of the suit?

A

Suit can be maintained whether dispossession is in due course of law or not

B

Suit cannot be brought against the government

C

Suit is maintainable only if the person is dispossessed without his consent

D

Suit must be filed within six months of dispossession

Carefully read following statements:
1. According to Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, requirement is of two persons, whereas under Section 149 of Indian Penal Code, requirement is of five persons.
2. According to Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, common intention is required whereas under Section 149 Indian Penal Code, common object is required
3. Previous consent is required under Section 34 & 149 of Indian Penal Code
4. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 149 of Indian Penal Code constitutes a specific offence
Which of the above statements is true:

A

1 and 3

B

2 and 3

C

1 and 2

D

2 and 4

Recovery of specific immovable property may be made under Section 5 of the Specific Relief Act, according to the

Related Questions