Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Which Section of the Criminal Procedure Code prohibits a Court of Session to take cognizance of any offence as a Court of Original Jurisdiction unless the case has been committed to it by a Magistrate under Criminal Procedure Code?

Which Section of the Criminal Procedure Code prohibits a Court of Session to take cognizance of any offence as a Court of Original Jurisdiction unless the case has been committed to it by a Magistrate under Criminal Procedure Code? Correct Answer Section 193

Related Questions

Which Section of The Criminal Procedure Code restricts the court of session from taking cognizance of any offence as a court of original jurisdiction unless the case has been committed to it by a magistrate?
Consider the following statements:
1. The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in any dispute between the Government of India and one or more States.
2. The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in any dispute between the Government of India and any State or States on one side and one or more other State on the other.
3. The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in any dispute between the Government of India and any corporation of Individual one side and one or more States on the other.
4. The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in any dispute between two or more States.
Which of these statements are correct?
Which of the following statements are correct in the context of Section 5 of Code of Civil Procedure?
1. Revenue Court is a part of Civil Court
2. Civil Court. means courts having original jurisdiction under Code of Civil Procedure but not Revenue Court
3. Civil Court means courts having original jurisdiction under Code of Civil Procedure including Revenue Court
4. Revenue Court is not a part of Civil Court
Where two or more courts have taken cognizance of the same offence and a question arises as to which of them ought to inquire into or try the offence, the question shall be decided
1. If the courts are subordinate to the same High Court, by that High Court
2. By the High Court within the local limits of whose appellate criminal jurisdiction the accused resides, carries on business or is engaged in a gainful employment
3. If the courts are subordinate to the same High Court, by that High Court in consultation with the State Government concerned
4. If the courts are not subordinate to the same High Court, by that court within the local limits of whose appellate criminal jurisdiction the proceedings were first commenced
Which of the above are correct?
Under Criminal Procedure Code where two or more courts have taken cognizance of the same offence and question arises as to which of them ought to try that offence, the question shall be decided
1. By the Supreme Court
2. If the Court are subordinate to the same High Court by that High Court
3. If the Courts are not subordinate to the same High Court, by the High Court within the local limits of whose appellate criminal jurisdiction the proceedings were first commenced
Choose the correct answer:
Which one of the following combinations are not correctly matched?
1. Anticipatory bail ⇔ Section 437 of Criminal Procedure Codeode
2. Summary dismissal ⇔ Section 384 of Criminal Procedure Codeode
3. Appeal in case of ⇔ Section 376 of Criminal Procedure Code acquittal Code
4. Reference to ⇔ Section 397 of Criminal Procedure Code High Court Code
Select correct answer:
Consider the following statements:
1. Section 144 of Criminal Procedure
Code is a wider and more general Section than Section 145 of Criminal Procedure Code.
2. Section 144 of Criminal Procedure Code is discretionary; whereas Section 145 of Criminal Procedure Code is mandatory.
Which one of the statements given above is/are correct?
Which one of the following combinations are correctly matched?
1. Anticipatory Bail ⇔ Section 438, Criminal Procedure Code
2. Summary Dismissal of Appeal ⇔ Section 384, Criminal Procedure Code
3. Reference to High Court ⇔ Section 394, Criminal Procedure Code
4. Compounding of Offences ⇔ Section 320, Criminal Procedure Code
Under the provisions of section 198(6) where an offence under section 676 of Indian Penal Code consists of sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife, the wife being under . . . . . . . . years of age, no court shall take cognizance of the offence if more than one year has elapsed from the date of the commission of the offence
When any person has reason to believe that he may be arrested on any accusation of having committed a non-bailable offence, he may apply to the High Court or the Court of Session for a direction under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 that in the event of such arrest he may be released on bail. The Court may, on such application, issue direction: