The Supreme Court in 2015 had laid down that an amendment to a criminal complaint to cure a simple infirmity curable by means of a formal amendment not causing any prejudice to the other side is permissible even though there is no specific provision in the Code of Criminal Procedure to amend a complaint filed under Code of Criminal procedure in the case of:

The Supreme Court in 2015 had laid down that an amendment to a criminal complaint to cure a simple infirmity curable by means of a formal amendment not causing any prejudice to the other side is permissible even though there is no specific provision in the Code of Criminal Procedure to amend a complaint filed under Code of Criminal procedure in the case of: Correct Answer S. R. Sukumar v. S. Sunaad Raghuram

Related Questions

A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court passes judgment in a matter. In a later case before a high court, a party presents the Supreme Court judgment as a binding authority. The opposing party claims that the high court is not bound by the Supreme Court's judgment because relevant provisions of law were not brought to the notice of the Supreme Court in that case. Which of the following is most correct in this case?
Principle: Article 141 of the Constitution provides that the law declared by the Supreme Court is binding on all courts within the territory of India.