Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Any person, who has accepted a tender of pardon made under Section 306 or Section 307, has, either by willfully concealing anything essential or by giving false evidence, not complied with the condition on which the tender was made. Who will certify this fact?

Any person, who has accepted a tender of pardon made under Section 306 or Section 307, has, either by willfully concealing anything essential or by giving false evidence, not complied with the condition on which the tender was made. Who will certify this fact? Correct Answer Public Prosecutor

Related Questions

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: State-run Energy Efficiency Services (EESL) has scrapped its second tender for procurement of 10,000 electric cars as the industry awaits clarification on specifications for chargers which will allow higher end, luxury automakers to come into the picture. This tender was floated in April and had been on hold after a preliminary pre-bid meeting. A similar tender was floated in August last year, and the rollout of 10,000 cars under the tender was expected to be completed by March 2019.  Why is EESL scraping the tender for procurement of 10,000 electric cars? Arguments: I. The share of luxury cars could go further up since it would be a good way of aggregating demand, Kumar said. This, however, strictly depends on the final order from DST. II. The tender had set aside 20% share of the total order for higher end and upgraded sedans category, which would allow foreign automakers like Nissan, Hyundai, Kia Motors to drive away with a fair share of the tender.  III. EESL said that the company has been awaiting clarification from the Department of Science & Technology (DST) to issue the standard norms for charging stations because of which the tender was first put on hold and now has been scrapped entirely.
The logic problems in this set present you with three true statements: Fact 1, Fact 2 and Fact 3. Then you are given three more statements (labelled I, II, III), and you must determine which of these, if any, is also a fact. One or two of the statements could be true; or none of the statements could be true. Fact 1: Jessica has four children. Fact 2: Two of the children have blue eyes and two of the children have brown eyes. Fact 3: Half of the children are girls. If the fist three statements are facts, which of the following statement/(s) must also be a fact? I. At least one girl has blue eyes. II. Two of the children are boys. III. The boys have brown eyes. Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
The logic problems in this set present you with three true statements: Fact 1, Fact 2 and Fact 3. Then you are given three more statements (labelled I, II, III), and you must determine which of these, if any, is also a fact. One or two of the statements could be true; or none of the statements could be true. Fact 1: Most stuffed toys are stuffed with beans. Fact 2: There are stuffed bears and stuffed tigers. Fact 3: Some chairs are stuffed with beans. If the fist three statements are facts, which of the following statement/(s) must also be a fact? I. Only children's chairs are stuffed with beans. II. All stuffed tigers are stuffed with beans. III. Stuffed monkeys are not stuffed with beans. Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
The logic problems in this set present you with three true statements: Fact 1, Fact 2 and Fact 3. Then you are given three more statements (labelled I, II, III), and you must determine which of these, if any, is also a fact. One or two of the statements could be true; or none of the statements could be true. Fact 1: All chickens are birds. Fact 2: Some chickens are hens. Fact 3: Female birds lay eggs. If the first three statements are facts, which of the following statement/(s) must also be a fact? I. All birds lay eggs. II. Hens are birds. III. Some chickens are not hens. Choose the correct answer from the options given below: 
The logic problems in this set present you with three true statements: Fact 1, Fact 2 and Fact 3. Then you are given three more statements (labelled I, II, III), and you must determine which of these, if any, is also a fact. One or two of the statements could be true; or none of the statements could be true. Fact 1: Pictures can tell a story. Fact 2: All storybooks have pictures. Fact 3: Some storybooks have both words and pictures. If the first three statements are facts, which of the following statement/(s) must also be a fact? I. Pictures can tell a story better than words can. II. The stories in storybooks are very simple. III. Some storybooks have both words and pictures. Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
The logic problems in this set present you with three true statements: Fact 1, Fact 2 and Fact 3. Then you are given three more statements (labelled I, II, III), and you must determine which of these, if any, is also a fact. One or two of the statements could be true; or none of the statements could be true. Fact 1: All hats have brims. Fact 2: There are black hats and blue hats. Fact 3: Baseball caps are hats. If the first three statements are facts, which of the following statement/(s) must also be a fact? I. All caps have brims. II. Some baseball caps are blue. III. Baseball caps have no brims. Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, in respect of confessional evidence
1. So much of the information as it relates distinctly to the fact discovered in consequence of information received from the person accused may be proved against him.
2. Person giving such information must be accused of an offence.
3. Accused need not be in the police custody.
4. Any statement of the accused confessing his guilt must be made in presence of a Magistrate, in all cases, whether anything is discovered or not in consequence of such statement, may be proved against him.
Fact in issue' is defined under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 that includes 'any fact from which, either by itself or in connection with other facts, the existence, non existence, nature, or extent of any right, liability or disability, asserted or denied in any suit or proceeding, necessarily follows'. In a case where 'A' is accused of murder, which one of the following fact is not a fact in issue?
Consider the following statements with reference to Pardoning power of Governor: 1. He can pardon, reprieve, respite, remit, suspend or commute the punishment or sentence of any person convicted of any offence against state law. 2. If a state law prescribes for a death sentence, he can pardon a death sentence. 3. He can grant pardon, reprieve, respite, suspension, remission or commutation in respect to punishment or sentence by a court-martial. Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?
Consider the following statements: i. The President of India can grant a pardon to a person who was convicted by the Martial Court. ii. The President can only pardon a person based on the advice of the union cabinet. iii. The Governor of State cannot grant pardon to a death sentence but he can commute the death sentence.   Which of the following above statements are true?