Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Oral admissions as to contents of electronic records are relevant when the genuineness of the:

Oral admissions as to contents of electronic records are relevant when the genuineness of the: Correct Answer Electronic record produced is in question

Related Questions

Oral admission as to contents of electronic records are relevant when;
Which of the following statements is/are correct?
Evidence under the Evidence Act means and includes
1. Oral evidence
2. All documents except electronic records
3. All documents including electronic records
Select the correct answer:
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below are followed by two arguments each numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the two arguments is the strong argument and which is the weak argument. Statement: Since the University of Delhi has a large number of outstation students, should the local students get priority admissions over the outstation students? Arguments: Yes. The locals do not want to share their resources with the outsiders. No. The admissions are on the basis of competition and better students deserve to get admissions first irrespective of the place they come from.
Whichof the following section of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 prescribes conditions for making oral admissions as to the contents of documents as relevant?
Whether the contents of documents or electronic records, can be proved by oral evidence?
Oral admission as to contents of electronic records are provided under the Indian Evidence Act in
Under Indian Evidence Act, 1872 the provision of relevancy of oral admission as to contents of electronic records is provided under
Consider the following statements in respect of the offence of robbery:
1. Causing fear of death may be relevant
2. Causing hurt may be relevant
3. Causing fear of hurt may be relevant
4. Causing wrongful restraint may be relevant
Which of the statements given above are correct?
Under the Evidence Act facts not otherwise relevant are relevant . . . . . . . .
1. If they are significant
2. If they are inconsistent with any fact in issue or relevant fact
3. If they make the existence or nonexistence of any fact in issue or relevant fact highly probable or improbable
Choose correct answer:
Consider the following statements regarding electronic voltmeter. 1) The detection of low-level signals is not possible using the electronic voltmeter 2) MOSFET is used at the input of the electronic voltmeter 3) Vacuum tube voltmeters (VTVM) consumes more power as compared to any non-electronic voltmeter. Which of the following is / are incorrect?