Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

"Facts not otherwise relevant are relevant if they are inconsistent with any fact in issue or relevant fact".
Which of the following sections of the Indian Evidence Act contains the aforesaid principle of law?

"Facts not otherwise relevant are relevant if they are inconsistent with any fact in issue or relevant fact".
Which of the following sections of the Indian Evidence Act contains the aforesaid principle of law? Correct Answer Section 11

Related Questions

Under the Evidence Act facts not otherwise relevant are relevant . . . . . . . .
1. If they are significant
2. If they are inconsistent with any fact in issue or relevant fact
3. If they make the existence or nonexistence of any fact in issue or relevant fact highly probable or improbable
Choose correct answer:
Which of the following distinction(s) is/are not correct between public issue and rights issue? (A) In public issue, applications for shares are invited from the general public and in rights issue, the shares are offered to existing shareholders. (B) In public issue there is no question of any over-subscription and in rights issue the shares may be under subscribed or over subscribed leading to prorata allotment. (C) The price of public issue is generally less than the market price and in rights issue, the price is deliberately made less than the market price. (D) In a public issue, the communication of the issue is through prospectus or advertisements and in a rights issue the communication is between the company and the existing members of the company. Choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:
Facts not otherwise relevant become relevant if they are inconsistent or makes highly probable or improbable any fact-In-issue or a relevant fact
Fact in issue' is defined under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 that includes 'any fact from which, either by itself or in connection with other facts, the existence, non existence, nature, or extent of any right, liability or disability, asserted or denied in any suit or proceeding, necessarily follows'. In a case where 'A' is accused of murder, which one of the following fact is not a fact in issue?
The logic problems in this set present you with three true statements: Fact 1, Fact 2 and Fact 3. Then you are given three more statements (labelled I, II, III), and you must determine which of these, if any, is also a fact. One or two of the statements could be true; or none of the statements could be true. Fact 1: Most stuffed toys are stuffed with beans. Fact 2: There are stuffed bears and stuffed tigers. Fact 3: Some chairs are stuffed with beans. If the fist three statements are facts, which of the following statement/(s) must also be a fact? I. Only children's chairs are stuffed with beans. II. All stuffed tigers are stuffed with beans. III. Stuffed monkeys are not stuffed with beans. Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
The logic problems in this set present you with three true statements: Fact 1, Fact 2 and Fact 3. Then you are given three more statements (labelled I, II, III), and you must determine which of these, if any, is also a fact. One or two of the statements could be true; or none of the statements could be true. Fact 1: All chickens are birds. Fact 2: Some chickens are hens. Fact 3: Female birds lay eggs. If the first three statements are facts, which of the following statement/(s) must also be a fact? I. All birds lay eggs. II. Hens are birds. III. Some chickens are not hens. Choose the correct answer from the options given below: 
The logic problems in this set present you with three true statements: Fact 1, Fact 2 and Fact 3. Then you are given three more statements (labelled I, II, III), and you must determine which of these, if any, is also a fact. One or two of the statements could be true; or none of the statements could be true. Fact 1: Pictures can tell a story. Fact 2: All storybooks have pictures. Fact 3: Some storybooks have both words and pictures. If the first three statements are facts, which of the following statement/(s) must also be a fact? I. Pictures can tell a story better than words can. II. The stories in storybooks are very simple. III. Some storybooks have both words and pictures. Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
The logic problems in this set present you with three true statements: Fact 1, Fact 2 and Fact 3. Then you are given three more statements (labelled I, II, III), and you must determine which of these, if any, is also a fact. One or two of the statements could be true; or none of the statements could be true. Fact 1: All hats have brims. Fact 2: There are black hats and blue hats. Fact 3: Baseball caps are hats. If the first three statements are facts, which of the following statement/(s) must also be a fact? I. All caps have brims. II. Some baseball caps are blue. III. Baseball caps have no brims. Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
The logic problems in this set present you with three true statements: Fact 1, Fact 2 and Fact 3. Then you are given three more statements (labelled I, II, III), and you must determine which of these, if any, is also a fact. One or two of the statements could be true; or none of the statements could be true. Fact 1: Jessica has four children. Fact 2: Two of the children have blue eyes and two of the children have brown eyes. Fact 3: Half of the children are girls. If the fist three statements are facts, which of the following statement/(s) must also be a fact? I. At least one girl has blue eyes. II. Two of the children are boys. III. The boys have brown eyes. Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
To constitute a matter of res judicata which of the following conditions must concur?
1. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit or issue must be the same matter which was directly and substantially in issue either actually (section 11, explanation III) or constructively (section 11, explanation IV) in the former suit
2. The former suit must have been a suit between the same parties under whom they or any of them claim. Explanation VI of Section 11 must be read with this condition
3. The parties as aforesaid must have litigated under the same title in the former suit
4. The court which decided the former suit must have been a court competent to try the subsequent suit of the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised. Explanation II of section 11 is to be read with condition
5. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit must have been heard and finally decided by the court in the first suit. Explanation V of section 11 is to be read with this condition