X' is tried for committing murder of 'Y' by administering poison. The fact that before Y's death, 'X' purchased similar poison is relevant because:

X' is tried for committing murder of 'Y' by administering poison. The fact that before Y's death, 'X' purchased similar poison is relevant because: Correct Answer The fact reveals the conduct of Y before incidence

Bissoy MCQ

Related Questions

A' is tried for murder of 'B' by administering Potassium Cynide. The fact that A has purchased potassium cynide just before the murder of B is relevant under
Under the Evidence Act facts not otherwise relevant are relevant . . . . . . . .
1. If they are significant
2. If they are inconsistent with any fact in issue or relevant fact
3. If they make the existence or nonexistence of any fact in issue or relevant fact highly probable or improbable
Choose correct answer:
A is tried for the murder of B by poison. The fact that before the death of B, A produced poison similar to that which was administered to B, is
PRINCIPLE: 1. A person is liable for death penalty when he does an act which is likely to cause death, and that person knows that his act in all probability will only result in death.
2. Death penalty is given only in rarest of rare cases.
FACT: Sunita, a married woman was flogged out of her husband's house by her father-in-law. When she was living with her parents, she got involved with a widower who also had an affair with Anita. In a fit of jealousy, Sunita killed her rival, Anita, as well as her little baby. Sunita also disfigured the faces of Anita and her baby and buried the bodies. Later, Sunita was tried for murder.
A' is tried for the murder of 'B'. The fact that marks on the ground produced by a struggle at or near the place where the murder was committed are relevant facts. It is an illustration of:
Facts not otherwise relevant become relevant if they are inconsistent or makes highly probable or improbable any fact-In-issue or a relevant fact
"Facts not otherwise relevant are relevant if they are inconsistent with any fact in issue or relevant fact".
Which of the following sections of the Indian Evidence Act contains the aforesaid principle of law?
Consider the following statements in respect of the offence of robbery:
1. Causing fear of death may be relevant
2. Causing hurt may be relevant
3. Causing fear of hurt may be relevant
4. Causing wrongful restraint may be relevant
Which of the statements given above are correct?
Atif is charged with the murder of Khuda Baksh on the 21st January, 1882. In fact, the murdered person's name was Haidar Baksh, and the date of the murder was the 20th January, 1882. Atif was never charged with any murder but one, and had heard the inquiry before the Magistrate, which referred exclusively to the case of Haidar Baksh. What will the Court infer from this while applying Section 215 Criminal Procedure Code?
X and Y conspire to poison Z. X in pursuance of the conspiracy procures the poison and delivers it to Y in order that he may administer it to Z. Y in pursuance of the conspiracy administers the poison in the presence of X and hereby causes Z's death. What offence, if any has been committed by X and Y, respectively?