Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Which of the following statement is correct?
1. Evidence of character in civil cases isirrelevant.
2. Previous conviction is relevant as evidence of bad character.
3. Evidence of good character is relevant in criminal cases.
4. Word cases character includes reputation only.

Which of the following statement is correct?
1. Evidence of character in civil cases isirrelevant.
2. Previous conviction is relevant as evidence of bad character.
3. Evidence of good character is relevant in criminal cases.
4. Word cases character includes reputation only. Correct Answer 1 and 3 are correct

Related Questions

Consider the following statements:
1. In criminal proceedings good character of the accused is always relevant
2. In criminal proceedings bad character of the accused is always relevant
3. In a civil case evidence of character of any person concerned is always admissible
4. A previous conviction is relevant as evidence of bad character
Which of the statements given above are correct?
A shopkeeper has 100 kg of good grade rice and x kg of bad grade rice. He brought good and bad grade rice for Rs. 20 and Rs. 10 respectively. He can sell the good and bad grade rice at Rs. 30 and Rs. 13.5 respectively. Out of x kg, if he mixes y kg of bad grade rice with good grade, he will get a profit of 69 2/7% from total sale. If he mixes y/2 kg of bad grade rice with good grade, he will get a profit of 57.5%. What is the profit he would have got if he sold honestly? (in rupees)
Evidences are adduced by the parties to the suit about the 'character'. As per the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, which of the following is/are correct?
1. Evidence of the character in civil proceedings is irrelevant and inadmissible generally.
2. The character evidence is admissible if it affects the amount of damages which he ought to receive.
3. The character evidence is admissible in so far as such character appears from facts otherwise relevant.
Select the correct answer:
Assertion (A): In criminal cases the fact that accused is of good character is relevant.
Reason (R): In criminal cases bad character of the accused is always irrelevant.
Select the correct answer:
In the following question, somestatements is followed by some conclusions,you have to take the given statements to betrue even if they seem to be at variance with
commonly known facts and then decide whichof the given logically follow. Choose thatconclusion as the answer. Statements:
Some roads are not good.
Some railways are good.
All airways are good.
Some roads are bad. Conclusions:
I. At least some bad are good.
II. No bad is good.
"When the previous commission by the accused of an offence is relevant, the previous conviction of such person is also a relevant fact." It is laid down in Section . . . . . . . . of Evidence Act.
In criminal proceedings, under which of the following situations, the fact that the accused person has bad character, is relevant?
1. Where the character of the accused is in issue
2. When it affects damages
3. To rebut prior evidence of good character
4. Where the court is satisfied
Select the correct answer:
In which of the following situations previous judgment is relevant . . . . . . . .
1. A prosecutes B for adultery with C, A's wife. B denies that C is A's wife but the court convicts B of adultery. Afterwards, C is prosecuted for bigamy in marrying B during A's lifetime.
C says that she never was A's wife. Whether the judgment against B is relevant as against C.
2. A prosecutes B for stealing a cow from him. B is convicted. A, afterwards, sues C for the cow, which B had sold to him before his conviction.
As between A and C whether the judgment against B is relevant?
Choose the correct answer:
In the following question, three statements are given followed by three conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) the given statements. Statements: I. Only a few chocolates are good. II. Only good is bad. III. Few cartoons are good. Conclusions: I. Some chocolates being bad is a possibility. II. All cartoons are chocolates. III. All cartoons are good.
Which of the following statements are correct in the context of Section 5 of Code of Civil Procedure?
1. Revenue Court is a part of Civil Court
2. Civil Court. means courts having original jurisdiction under Code of Civil Procedure but not Revenue Court
3. Civil Court means courts having original jurisdiction under Code of Civil Procedure including Revenue Court
4. Revenue Court is not a part of Civil Court