Which of the following combination are not correctly matched?
1. Voluntary and direct Acknowledgement of guilt - Admission
2. Self-exculpatory Confession of an accused - Cannot be used against co-accused when confessing accused is not on trial
3. Extra judicial confession - Corroboration is must
4. Evidence of police officer - Can be take as expert opinion
Select the correct answer:

Which of the following combination are not correctly matched?
1. Voluntary and direct Acknowledgement of guilt - Admission
2. Self-exculpatory Confession of an accused - Cannot be used against co-accused when confessing accused is not on trial
3. Extra judicial confession - Corroboration is must
4. Evidence of police officer - Can be take as expert opinion
Select the correct answer: Correct Answer 2 and 4

Bissoy MCQ

Related Questions

Choice the correct propositions:
1. Evidence of fingerprint expert is substantive evidence.
2. Evidence of fingerprint expert can be used only to corroborate some items of substantive evidence which are otherwise on record.
3. Evidence of fingerprint expert is not substantive evidence.
4. Evidence of fingerprint expert is admissible in all circumstances as expert evidence.
Under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, in respect of confessional evidence
1. So much of the information as it relates distinctly to the fact discovered in consequence of information received from the person accused may be proved against him.
2. Person giving such information must be accused of an offence.
3. Accused need not be in the police custody.
4. Any statement of the accused confessing his guilt must be made in presence of a Magistrate, in all cases, whether anything is discovered or not in consequence of such statement, may be proved against him.
Assertion (A): Extra-judicial confession, if voluntary, can be relied upon with other evidence.
Reason (R): Extra-judicial confession is a weak piece of evidence
Confession of a co-accused, not required to be an oath and cannot be tested by cross examination
1. Is no evidence within the meaning of Section 3 of Evidence Act and cannot be the foundation of a conviction
2. The only limited use which can be made of a confession of a co-accused is by way of furnishing an additional reason for believing such other evidences as exists
3. It is a very weak type of evidence and is much weaker even than the evidence of an approver .
In the aforesaid propositions:
Assertion (A): In certain cases corroboration of confession is necessary.
Reason (R): In all cases, an extra-judicial confession must be corroborated
Each material circumstance appearing in evidence against the accused must be put to the accused specifically, distinctly and separately. In this context, the propositions are
1. Failure to put the material evidence to the accused always vitiates the trial
2. Failure to put the material evidence amounts to a serious irregularity which can not be cured and vitiates the trial, if it has prejudiced the accused.
3. Failure to put the material evidence is not considered to services & is curable if infact no failure of justice has occasioned to the accused.
Now which of the following is correct
Which of the following statements are correct?
1. Investigation is made by a police officer.
2. The object of police investigation is to collect evidence.
3. Investigation is a judicial proceeding.
4. Investigation is not a judicial proceeding.
Select the correct answer:
Statement : Residents from Model Colony coming under North Ward of City X have complained to the Ward Officer that for last three days the tap water in the ward is contaminated and no action is being initiated by municipal staff.

Courses of Action :
I. The Ward Officer of North Ward should initiate action against residents who have lodged complaints against municipal staff.
II. The Ward Officer should ask his junior officer to visit Model Colony to assess the actual condition of water with his staff and to get samples of water tested from laboratories.
III. The Ward Officer should ask Ward Engineer to check water installations and pipelines in the Model Colony area.
What is the evidentiary value of the confession of a co-accused implicating himself as well as his other non-confessing co-accused?
Consider the following statements:
1. Investigation is made by a police officer
2. The object of police investigation is to collect evidence
3. Investigation is a judicial proceeding
4. Investigation is not a judicial proceeding
Which of the statements given above are correct?