Related Questions

Under which Section of the Indian Evidence Act, the burden of proving that the case of an accused comes within the exceptions, lies on the accused?
The burden of proving that the case of the accused comes within any of the General Exceptions in the Indian Penal Code is upon the
Under Indian Evidence Act, 1872, in a trial, the burden of proving the plea of insanity of accused lies on:
Which of the following statements is/are correct?
All evidence taken in the course of the trial or other proceeding must be taken in the presence of the
1. Accused only.
2. Accused and his pleader.
3. Pleader of the accused, when the attendance of the accused is dispensed with.
4. Accused, except as otherwise provided under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Select the correct answer:
Each material circumstance appearing in evidence against the accused must be put to the accused specifically, distinctly and separately. In this context, the propositions are
1. Failure to put the material evidence to the accused always vitiates the trial
2. Failure to put the material evidence amounts to a serious irregularity which can not be cured and vitiates the trial, if it has prejudiced the accused.
3. Failure to put the material evidence is not considered to services & is curable if infact no failure of justice has occasioned to the accused.
Now which of the following is correct
The burden of proving the existence of circumstances bringing the case within the General Exceptions in Indian Penal Code is
When any fact is especially with in the knowledge of accused, the burden of proving that fact is upon.
Burden of proving the existence of exceptions is put on accused by the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 under Section
Burden of proving plea of insanity lies on
Where the wife files a petition for restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on whom lies the burden of proving "reasonable excuse for withdrawal from the society"?