Related Questions

Consider the following statements:
1. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code requires two persons whereas Section 149 of Indian Penal Code require five persons.
2. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code requires common intention, whereas Section 149 of Indian Penal Code requires common object
3. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 149 of Indian Penal Code both require presence of a prior consent
4. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and section 149 of Indian Penal Code. Both create specific offence
Which of the above statements are correct?
Carefully read following statements:
1. According to Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, requirement is of two persons, whereas under Section 149 of Indian Penal Code, requirement is of five persons.
2. According to Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, common intention is required whereas under Section 149 Indian Penal Code, common object is required
3. Previous consent is required under Section 34 & 149 of Indian Penal Code
4. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 149 of Indian Penal Code constitutes a specific offence
Which of the above statements is true:
The burden of proving that the case of the accused comes within any of the General Exceptions in the Indian Penal Code is upon the
Under which Section of the Indian Evidence Act, the burden of proving that the case of an accused comes within the exceptions, lies on the accused?
Burden of proving the existence of exceptions is put on accused by the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 under Section
Which of the following combinations are correctly matched?
1. Harbour ⇔ Section 51A, Indian Penal Code
2. Wrongful Loss ⇔ Section 23, Indian Penal Code
3. Gang rape on woman under twelve years of age ⇔ Section 376DB, Indian Penal Code
4. Gang rape ⇔ Section 376D, Indian Penal Code
Select the correct answer:
Section 105 of the Evidence Act requires that the Court . . . . . . . . presume the absence of such circumstances which brings a case within the purview of the General Exceptions in the Indian Penal Code.
If an accused takes the plea of his case being covered under any of the "General Exceptions" provided under Chapter IV, Indian Penal Code, the burden of proof in that case lies-
Accused persons were charged under section 302 read with section 149, Indian Penal Code. The existence of common intention amongst the accused persons was established from the surrounding circumstances and from their conduct on the spot. No charge had been framed under section 34, Indian Penal Code. In such case
Which one of the following statements is correct?
The general defenses provided under. General Exceptions in the Indian Penal Code (Indian Penal Code) can be pleaded