Assertion (A): Proviso to Section 132, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is a facet of rule against self-incrimination.Reason (R): Policy of Section 132, Indian Evidence Act is to procure evidence for doing justice.Choose the correct answer:

Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A

Both A and R are true and R is not the correct explanation of A

Assertion (A): Proviso to Section 132, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is a facet of rule against self-incrimination.<br>Reason (R): Policy of Section 132, Indian Evidence Act is to procure evidence for doing justice.<br>Choose the correct answer:

An assertion and a reason are given below. Assertion: The phenomenon of nuclear fission generates great energy. Reason: The process in which a nucleus is broken into two parts is called nuclear fission. Choose the answer. A. Both Assertion and Reason are true and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion. B. Both Assertion and Reason are true but Reason is not the correct explanation of Assertion. C. Both Assertion and Reason are false. D. Assertion is true but Reason is false.

A

B

D

C

B

D

C

Nothing in section 23 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 shall be taken to exempt any barrister, pleader attorney or vakil from giving evidence of any matter of which he may be compelled to give evidence is provided by the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, under:

A

Section 127

B

Section 128

C

Section 129

D

Section 126

Among 500 villagers, 40% are doing businesses and 80% are doing jobs. If all of the mare either doing business or jobs, then the number of villagers who are doing only job are how much more than that who are doing only business?

A

400

B

100

C

200

D

300

Which of the following among item A and item B are correct?
The right of private defence extends, subject to Section 99, to the causing of death of the assailant or aggressor in the following circumstances:
Item A: For defence of body:
1. Against an act which reasonably causes the apprehension of an assault to outrage the modesty
2. Against an act which reasonably causes the apprehension that the assailant will kill his children living in another city
3. Against an act which reasonably causes the apprehension that grievous hurt would otherwise be the consequence
Item B: For defence of property:
1. While the trespasser is engaged in house breaking during day time.
2. Against a thief who reasonably causes the defender to believe that he would lose his property
3. Against a person who commits mischief under such circumstances as may reasonably cause apprehension that grievous Hurt would be a consequence
Select the correct answer:

A

1 and 3 of both items

B

2 and 3 of both items

C

3 alone of both items

D

1 and 2 of both items

The question below is followed by three statements I, II and III. You have to determine whether the data given is sufficient for answering the question. You should use the data and your knowledge of mathematics to choose the best possible answer. How many runs Sachin scored against Kashmir? I. The difference between his score against Mumbai and against Delhi is equal to the difference between the score against Delhi and against Kashmir. II. The average run he scored against all three states Delhi, Kashmir and Mumbai is 100. III. He scored 25 runs more against Mumbai than Kashmir.

A

Any two statements together are sufficient to answer the question.

B

All the statements together are required to answer the question.

C

Statement I and Il together are sufficient to answer the question.

D

Statement Il and Ill together are sufficient to answer the question.

E

Statement I and Ill together are sufficient to answer the question.

Read Assertion (A) and Reason (R) and give the correct answer by using the given below:
Assertion (A): A proposal may be revoked at any time before the communication of its acceptance is complete as against the proposer, But not afterwards.
Reason (R): Section 5 of the Indian contract Act 1872, deals with the revocation of proposals and acceptances.

A

Both (A) and (R) are correct, but (R) is not related to (A)

B

(A) is correct, but (R) is wrong

C

(A) is wrong, but (R) is correct

D

Both (A) and (R) are correct, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)

A

1 and 3

B

2 and 3

C

1 and 2

D

2 and 4

Directions: A string of words is fed into a computing machine. It processes the input and gives an output in the following manner: Input: Honesty is the best policy. Step 1: is Honesty the best policy Step 2: is the Honesty best policy Step 3: is the best Honesty policy Step 4: is the best policy Honesty Output: is the best policy Honesty Now, If the input is "A rolling stone gathers no moss", what will be the fifth word in the string after 4 steps?

A

Moss

B

No

C

Stone

D

A

Which one of the following Sections of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 is expressly excluded by the proviso to Section 50 of the Indian Evidence Act. 1872?

A

Section 354

B

Section 354A

C

Section 498A

D

Section 497

Select the incorrect statements:
1. The Indian Evidence Act does not apply to arbitration proceedings.
2. The Indian Evidence Act does not apply to proceedings before a Commissioner appointed by the court for recording evidence
3. The Indian Evidence Act applies to affidavits presented to Courts
4. The Indian Evidence Act applies to judicial proceedings held before all kinds of military courts

A

2 and 3 are incorrect

B

2, 3 and 4 are incorrect

C

1 and 3 are incorrect

D

None of the above is incorrect

Assertion (A): Proviso to Section 132, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is a facet of rule against self-incrimination.
Reason (R): Policy of Section 132, Indian Evidence Act is to procure evidence for doing justice.
Choose the correct answer:

Related Questions