Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Related Questions

Consider the following statement and identify the correct answer:
Statement I: A, the owner of a watch, gives his watch for repair against a charge to B. A however, took away the watch after repairing without paying any charge and without the consent of B. A has made himself liable for the offence of theft as he has acted with dishonest intention at the time of taking his watch back.
Statement II: The offence of theft is an offence against possession.
PRINCIPLES: 1. Nothing is an offence which is done in the exercise of the right of private defense.
2. When an act, which would otherwise be a certain offence, is not that offence, by reason of the youth, the want of maturity of understanding, the unsoundness of mind or the intoxication of that person or by reason of misconception on the part of that person, every person has the same right of private defense against that act, which he would have if that act were an offence.
3. Everyone has the right to defend their life and property against criminal harm provided it is not possible to approach public authorities and more harm than that is necessary has not been caused to avert the danger.
4. If in the exercise of right of private defense against an assault which reasonably causes the apprehension of death, the defender be so situated that he cannot effectually exercise that right without risk of harm to an innocent person, his right of private defense extends to the running of that risk.
5. The right of private defense continues as long as apprehension of danger continues.
FACT: A enters by night a house which he is legally entitled to enter. Z, in good faith, taking A for a housebreaker, attacks A.
The question below is followed by three statements I, II and III. You have to determine whether the data given is sufficient for answering the question. You should use the data and your knowledge of mathematics to choose the best possible answer. How many runs Sachin scored against Kashmir? I. The difference between his score against Mumbai and against Delhi is equal to the difference between the score against Delhi and against Kashmir. II. The average run he scored against all three states Delhi, Kashmir and Mumbai is 100. III. He scored 25 runs more against Mumbai than Kashmir.
If an accused is charged of a major offence, but on the facts established he cannot be held guilty of that major offence. At the same time the facts established indicates that the minor offence has been committed, the person so tried for major offence can be convicted for such minor offence, it has been so provided
Read the following passage carefully and choose the most appropriate answer to the question out of the four alternatives.
True, It is the function of the army to maintain law and order in abnormal times. But in normal times there is another force that compels citizens to obey the laws and to act with due regard to the rights of others. The force also protects the lives and the properties of law abiding men. Laws are made to secure the personal safety of its subjects and to prevent murder and crimes of violence. They are made to secure the property of the citizens against theft and damage to protect the rights of communities and castes to carry out their customs and ceremonies, so long as they do not conflict with the rights of others. Now the good citizen, of his own free will obey these laws and he takes care that everything he does is done with due regard to the rights and well-being of others. But the bad citizen is only restrained from breaking these laws by fear of the consequence of his actions. And the necessary steps to compel the bad citizen to act as a good citizen are taken by this force. The supreme control of law and order in a State is in the hands of a Minister who is responsible to the State Assembly and acts through the Inspector General of Police.
"They are made to secure the property of citizens against theft and damage" means that the law:
Principle: Whoever attempts to commit an offence and in such attempt does any act towards the commission of the offence shall be punished.
Factual Situation: A, a trustee makes an attempt to steal some jewels by breaking open a box belonging to the Trust Band finds after opening the box, that there is no jewel in it. A is prosecuted for the offence of attempting to commit theft.
A is accused of an act which may amount to theft, or receiving stolen property or criminal teach of trust or cheating. He is only charged with theft but it appears that he committed the offence of criminal breach of trust. He may be:
A' commits theft on property in 'B's possession; and while committing this theft, he has a loaded pistol under his garment, having provided this pistol for the purpose of hurting 'B' in case 'B' should resist. 'A' has committed an offence under:
A' commits theft of property' in B's possession and while committing this theft he has a loaded pistol under the garment kept for the purpose of hurting 'B' in case 'B' should resists. The offence committed by 'A' is defined under which section of Indian Penal Code, 1860?
A wrote a letter to his lawyer X that he is going to commit theft and in case he is apprehended, he should be protected. Can X be witness against A in case of charge of theft?