Abetment of any offence if the person abetted does the act with a different intention from that of the abettor is dealt under

Consider the following statements.
To constitute abetment, it is:
1. Necessary that the act abetted must be committed
2. Not necessary that the act abetted must be committed
3. Necessary that the person abetted must have the same intention or knowledge as that of the abettor
Which of the statements given above represent(s) the correct position of law?

A

Only B

B

Both B and C

C

Only A

D

Only C

Consider the following statements:
To constitute abetmentit is
1. Necessary that the act abetted must be committed.
2. Not necessary that the act abetted must be committed.
3. Necessary that the person abetted must have the same intention or knowledge as that of the abettor.
Which of the statement given above represent(s) the correct position of law?

A

2 only

B

2 and 3

C

1 only

D

3 only

Which of the following statements are correct?
1. Abettor may be liable for a different offence than that for which principal is liable
2. Abettor is liable even if principal is innocent
3. Abettor's liability is dependent on the liability of the principal
4. Abettor must have the same guilty intention or knowledge as the principle
Select the correct answer:

A

1 and 2

B

1, 3 and 4

C

1, 2 and 4

D

2, 3 and 4

Abetment may include:
1 Abetment by instigation
2. Abetment by conspiracy
3. Abetment by aid
4. Abetment by acquiescence and
5. Abetment by silence:

A

Only the first three constitute abetment

B

All the five constitute abetment

C

Only the first four amount to abetment

D

Only 2, 4 and 5 amount to abetment

Abetment of an offence punishable with imprisonment, if the abettor or the person abetted be a public servant, whose duty is to prevent the offence is dealt under

A

Section 116 of Indian Penal Code

B

Section 117 of Indian Penal Code

C

Section 118 of Indian Penal Code

D

Section 119 of Indian Penal Code

Abetment of any offence, when an effect is caused by the act abetted different from that intended by the abettor is dealt under-

A

Section 110 of Indian Penal Code

B

Section 111 of Indian Penal Code

C

Section 112 of Indian Penal Code

D

Section 113 of Indian Penal Code

When an act is abetted and a different act is done by the person instigated, the abettor is liable for the act done in the same manner and to the same extent as if he had directly abetted it, provided:

A

The act done was a probable consequence of the abetment irrespective of being committed under the influence of instigation

B

The act was done with the aid or in pursuance of the conspiracy which constituted the abetment

C

The abettor had reasonable ground to believe that a different act may be committed

D

All of the above

To prove both the parts of the offence contemplated in Section 116 of the Indian Penal Code, which of the following must be proved by the prosecution?
1. To prove the first part, the accused did abet the offence either by instigation or by conspiracy or by intentional aiding or by illegal omission.
2. To prove the first part, the offence was such which is punishable with imprisonment.
3. To prove the second part, the person abetted was a public servant during the period he was abetted.
4. To prove the second part, it was the duty of such public servant to prevent the commission of such an offence.

A

1 and 3

B

1 and 4

C

2 and 4

D

1, 2, 3, 4

Abetment of any offence when one act is abetted and a different act is done; subject to proviso is dealt under-

A

Section 109 of Indian Penal Code

B

Section 110 of Indian Penal Code

C

Section 111 of Indian Penal Code

D

Section 112 of Indian Penal Code

(A) For the purpose of offence of abetment, it is not necessary that the act abetted must be committed.
(R) Abetment is offence per se.

A

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)

B

Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)

C

(A) is true and (R) is false

D

Both (A) and (R) are false

Abetment of any offence if the person abetted does the act with a different intention from that of the abettor is dealt under

Related Questions