Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

A public servant concealing a design to commit an offence which it is his duty to prevent if the offence be punishable with death or imprisonment for life is dealt under

A public servant concealing a design to commit an offence which it is his duty to prevent if the offence be punishable with death or imprisonment for life is dealt under Correct Answer Section 119 of Indian Penal Code

Related Questions

Concealing a design to commit an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life, if the offence be committed is dealt under
To prove both the parts of the offence contemplated in Section 116 of the Indian Penal Code, which of the following must be proved by the prosecution?
1. To prove the first part, the accused did abet the offence either by instigation or by conspiracy or by intentional aiding or by illegal omission.
2. To prove the first part, the offence was such which is punishable with imprisonment.
3. To prove the second part, the person abetted was a public servant during the period he was abetted.
4. To prove the second part, it was the duty of such public servant to prevent the commission of such an offence.
Concealing a design to commit an offence punishable with imprisonment, if offence be committed if the offence be not committed is dealt under-
Provisions of Chapter XXIA Criminal Procedure Code are not applicable to cases where the final report discloses:
1. Offences punishable for death
2. Offences punishable for imprisonment of life
3. Offences punishable for a term exceeding seven years' imprisonment
4. Offences punishable for a term exceeding three years' imprisonment
Which of the following is correct:
Abetment of an offence punishable with imprisonment, if the abettor or the person abetted be a public servant, whose duty is to prevent the offence is dealt under
Consider the following statements:
1. A court has no power to release a woman on bail if the offence is punishable with death or imprisonment for life.
2. An accused shall not be released on bail by a court if he had been convicted previously on two or more occasions of a cognizable offence punishable with imprisonment for three years or more.
3. Necessity for identification by witnesses during investigation shall not be sufficient ground for rejection of bail.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
Which of the following ingredient is to be proved of an offence under Section 128, Indian Penal Code by the prosecution?
1. The accused is a public servant
2. That a State prisoner or prisoner of war is confined in a place
3. That such accused (public servant) has in his custody such State prisoner or prisoner of war
4. That the accused public servant has voluntarily allowed a prisoner to escape from the place of confinement
Consider the following statement(s).
A police officer has the power to arrest any person without an order from a magistrate or warrant of arrest, if he has reason to suspect his complicity in a cognizable offence punishable with imprisonment which may extend to seven years, provided that he is satisfied for reasons in writing that such arrest is necessary
1. To prevent such person from committing any further offence.
2. For proper investigation of the offence.
3. To prevent such person from tampering with or causing the evidence of the offence to disappear.
4. To compel the absconding co-accused to surrender.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
Public servant "A" while discharging his officialfunctions, issues a document with incorrect particulars knowing that by this action, he is likely to harm another public servant "B". The public servant "A" is responsible for which of the following offence?
Consider the following statements:
1. A public servant accepted gratification to show favour to a person.
2. A person expecting to become a public servant accepted gratification to show favour.
3. A person not expecting to be in office accepted gratification to show favour.
Which of the above amount to an offence by a public servant u/s 161 Indian Penal Code?