The accused driver of a truck while driving on the left side i.e., his side of the road, sees a cyclist coming from the opposite direction, but on the wrong side of the road i.e. in the lane on which the truck was being driven; the road being narrow and the truck driver sensing that the cyclist was peddling negligently, maneuvers his truck on the opposite lane and simultaneously the cyclist suddenly moves to his lane and as a result the truck over-runs the cyclist, causing the death of cyclist. The truck driver is not guilty of the offence of causing death by rash and negligent act because:

The accused driver of a truck while driving on the left side i.e., his side of the road, sees a cyclist coming from the opposite direction, but on the wrong side of the road i.e. in the lane on which the truck was being driven; the road being narrow and the truck driver sensing that the cyclist was peddling negligently, maneuvers his truck on the opposite lane and simultaneously the cyclist suddenly moves to his lane and as a result the truck over-runs the cyclist, causing the death of cyclist. The truck driver is not guilty of the offence of causing death by rash and negligent act because: Correct Answer The truck driver upon seeing the risk tried to avoid the risk

To establish the offense of causing death by a rash and negligent act, it is necessary to prove that the accused had a rash or negligent act and that act resulted in the death of a person. However, in this scenario, the truck driver, upon seeing the cyclist coming from the wrong side of the road, took evasive action by maneuvering his truck onto the opposite lane to avoid a collision. It was the sudden movement of the cyclist into the truck driver's lane that caused the accident and subsequent death of the cyclist.

The truck driver's actions in trying to avoid the risk demonstrate that he acted with caution and attempted to prevent the accident. In this case, the truck driver's conduct does not fulfill the criteria of a rash or negligent act, as he took reasonable steps to avoid the collision.

Therefore, the correct answer is:
C. The truck driver, upon seeing the risk, tried to avoid the risk

Related Questions

A cyclist negligently dashed against a bus and was killed in the accident. The bus driver was also found negligent in not averting the possible accident. The wife of the deceased cyclist brought a civil action for damages for the death of her husband. To want extent, if at all, will she succeed?
An army truck driven by an army driver while going to leave army jawans on the station for enabling them to catch their home town, hit a pedestrian and killed him due to rash and negligent driving. Which one of the following is correct?
An army truck driven by an army driver, while going to check the armymen on duties, hit X, a pedestrian, and injured him seriously on account of rash and negligent driving. M sued the Government of India. The defence was a sovereign functions.
A' and 'B' have been accused of an offence where the accused persons had no intention of causing the death of any one and no injury was found on the deceased which was sufficient to cause death in the ordinary course of nature. As per medical opinion, the injuries were not likely to cause death. It could not be established as to which of the two accused inflicted injuries on the head of the deceased. The accused should be liable to be convicted under: