Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Which of the following is/are correct?
For an offence of extortion
1. It is necessary that the threat made and the property received be by one and the same person.
2. It is not necessary that the person who received threat and the person who delivered the property be one and the same person.
Select the correct answer:

Which of the following is/are correct?
For an offence of extortion
1. It is necessary that the threat made and the property received be by one and the same person.
2. It is not necessary that the person who received threat and the person who delivered the property be one and the same person.
Select the correct answer: Correct Answer 2 only

Related Questions

There are flowers in a basket which are to be distributed to five persons standing in a row. The second person received half of the number of flowers given to the first person, the third person received half of the number of flowers received to the second person; the fourth person received half of the number of flowers received to the third person and the fifth person received half of the number of flowers received to the fourth person. If the fifth person received only one flower and there is no flower remaining in the basket, how many flowers were their in the basket?
PRINCIPLES: 1. Nothing is an offence which is done in the exercise of the right of private defense.
2. When an act, which would otherwise be a certain offence, is not that offence, by reason of the youth, the want of maturity of understanding, the unsoundness of mind or the intoxication of that person or by reason of misconception on the part of that person, every person has the same right of private defense against that act, which he would have if that act were an offence.
3. Everyone has the right to defend their life and property against criminal harm provided it is not possible to approach public authorities and more harm than that is necessary has not been caused to avert the danger.
4. If in the exercise of right of private defense against an assault which reasonably causes the apprehension of death, the defender be so situated that he cannot effectually exercise that right without risk of harm to an innocent person, his right of private defense extends to the running of that risk.
5. The right of private defense continues as long as apprehension of danger continues.
FACT: A enters by night a house which he is legally entitled to enter. Z, in good faith, taking A for a housebreaker, attacks A.
Consider the following statement(s).
A police officer has the power to arrest any person without an order from a magistrate or warrant of arrest, if he has reason to suspect his complicity in a cognizable offence punishable with imprisonment which may extend to seven years, provided that he is satisfied for reasons in writing that such arrest is necessary
1. To prevent such person from committing any further offence.
2. For proper investigation of the offence.
3. To prevent such person from tampering with or causing the evidence of the offence to disappear.
4. To compel the absconding co-accused to surrender.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
The propositions are
1. The general property in goods can be with one person while the special property in the same goods be with the another person.
2. The transfer of general property in goods to one person can be done subject to a special property in the same goods in another person.
3. The special property in goods can be only with the person having general property in goods.
In respect of the aftersaid proposition which of the following is true
Eight friends— A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H are sitting around a circular table facing the centre. Each one of them likes different brands of television—Onida, Sony, Samsung, Micromax, TCL, LG, Toshiba and Sansui, but not necessarily in the same order. A sits third to the right of the person who likes Sansui. A does not like Samsung. E is not an immediate neighbour of H. C sits on the immediate right of the person who likes Samsung.                                     Neither A nor H likes TCL or a Sony. The person who likes TCL is not an immediate neighbour of the person who likes Sansui. The person who likes Onida sits second to the left of E. The person who likes Onida is an immediate neighbour of the both persons who like LG and Toshiba. Person who likes Toshiba sits third to the right of B. B does not like TCL. F is not an immediate neighbour of A. G is not an immediate neighbour of the person who likes Onida. Only two people sit between the person who likes Toshiba and H. The persons who like TCL and the Sony are immediate neighbours of each other. Which of the following brands of television is liked by H?
If an accused is charged of a major offence, but on the facts established he cannot be held guilty of that major offence. At the same time the facts established indicates that the minor offence has been committed, the person so tried for major offence can be convicted for such minor offence, it has been so provided
Section 34 of Indian Penal Code provides for liability based on common intention. Consider the following situations:
1. The weapon used in the offence was found in A's house
2. A has procured the weapon of offence voluntarily to aid the criminal gang
3. A was compelled under threat to his life to procure the weapon of offence
4. The weapon was supplied on receipt of value of the weapon (sale)
Which of the situation given above reflect(s) the correct ingredients with regard to Section 34?
To prove both the parts of the offence contemplated in Section 116 of the Indian Penal Code, which of the following must be proved by the prosecution?
1. To prove the first part, the accused did abet the offence either by instigation or by conspiracy or by intentional aiding or by illegal omission.
2. To prove the first part, the offence was such which is punishable with imprisonment.
3. To prove the second part, the person abetted was a public servant during the period he was abetted.
4. To prove the second part, it was the duty of such public servant to prevent the commission of such an offence.
Read the following information carefully and answer the questions that follow: Seven persons Tina, Vini, Yasir, Rishi, Sanya, Pankaj and Urmila live on the separate floors of a 7- floor building. Ground floor is number one; second floor is number two and so on. Each of them goes to a city viz. Paris, Istanbul, Shanghai, Durban, London, Madrid and Dubai but not necessarily in the same order. Only three people live above the floor on which Sanya lives. Only one person lives between Sanya and the one who goes to Paris. Vini lives just below the person who goes to Madrid. Only three people live between the one who goes to Paris and London. The person who goes to Madrid lives on an even numbered floor. Urmila lives just above Rishi. Urmila does not go to London. Only two persons live between Pankaj and the one who goes to Durban. Pankaj lives above the person who goes to Durban. Yasir does not go to Istanbul. Tina does not live just above or just below Sanya. The one who goes to Shanghai does not live just above or just below Pankaj. Who among the following lives on floornumber 7?
An advocate who is accused-
1. Of a criminal offence is entitled to conduct his own defence
2. Of a criminal offence is not entitled to conduct his own defence
3. With others of a criminal offence is not entitled to appear at the trial as counsel for his co-accused
4. With others of a criminal offence is entitled to appear at the trial as counsel for his co-accused