Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

One Mrs. Komai bought a car on the name of her daughter, Kiran, who is a minor, and got the insurance policy transferred on her name (Mrs. Komal). The car met with an accident on two counts and she file for a claim on both the counts, from the insurance agency. She acknowledged the receipt of the money as Kiran. The insurance company her prosecuted under Section 467 of the Indian Penal Code alleging fraud on the appellant's part?

One Mrs. Komai bought a car on the name of her daughter, Kiran, who is a minor, and got the insurance policy transferred on her name (Mrs. Komal). The car met with an accident on two counts and she file for a claim on both the counts, from the insurance agency. She acknowledged the receipt of the money as Kiran. The insurance company her prosecuted under Section 467 of the Indian Penal Code alleging fraud on the appellant's part? Correct Answer Mrs. Komal is not guilty of forgery because the said deceit did not secure her any advantage as the entire transaction was that of Mrs. Komal

Related Questions

Consider the following statements:
1. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code requires two persons whereas Section 149 of Indian Penal Code require five persons.
2. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code requires common intention, whereas Section 149 of Indian Penal Code requires common object
3. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 149 of Indian Penal Code both require presence of a prior consent
4. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and section 149 of Indian Penal Code. Both create specific offence
Which of the above statements are correct?
Carefully read following statements:
1. According to Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, requirement is of two persons, whereas under Section 149 of Indian Penal Code, requirement is of five persons.
2. According to Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, common intention is required whereas under Section 149 Indian Penal Code, common object is required
3. Previous consent is required under Section 34 & 149 of Indian Penal Code
4. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 149 of Indian Penal Code constitutes a specific offence
Which of the above statements is true:
Seven friends, Anil, Sunil, Rohit, Puja, Shalini, Pradhi and Gaurav bought seven cars during a week but each one bought their cars on a different day of the week. Each of them also bought a different brand of car. The brands are: Maruti, Honda, Toyota, Renault, Tata, Mahindra and Hyundai. Consider the week stated on a Monday and ended on the following Sunday. The following information are known: Rohit bought a Hyundai on Monday On Sunday, one of them bought a Renault. Shalini bought her car just the day after Anil and just the day before Gaurav Anil bought a Mahindra car Puja bought a Tata car on Friday Sunil did not buy either a Toyota or a Renault Gaurav bought a Maruti On which day did Shalini buy her car and what was the brand of her car?
A (a 25 year old man) was B's (a 23 year old woman) neighbour. He fell in love with her and wanted to ask her to enter into a relationship with him. He sent her a number of text messages proclaiming his love for her. She did not respond to his overtures. On November 18, 2013, A went to B's house and told her that he was in love with her, and wanted to marry her. She told him that she was not interested and asked him to leave. A believed that B was only playing hard to get, and if he persisted, she would change her mind. On November 25, 2013, when B was returning home from her workplace, A met her again and proclaimed his love for her again. She again told him that she was not interested, and threatened to complain to the police. In spite of this, a week later, when B was leaving for work, she noticed that A was waiting outside her house, with a bouquet of flowers, and he tried to give her the flowers. B ignored him once again, and went to the police station to complain about A's acts. Under what Section of the Indian Penal Code should the police register the FIR (First Information Report)
Consider the following statements:
1. In the case of Mithu v. State of Punjab, the constitutional validity of Section 303 of the Indian Penal Code was examined by the Supreme Court of India and held that this Section violates Article 14 and Article 21 of the Constitution,
2. Counsel for appellants/petitioners in the above case contended that Section 303 of the Indian Penal Code is arbitrary, because it authorizes deprivation of life by an unjust and unfair procedure.
3. Section 303 of the Indian Penal Code provides punishment for culpable homicide by causing death of person other that the person whose death was intended.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
In the following question the 1st and the last part of the sentence/passage are numbered 1 and 6. The rest of the sentence/ passage is split into four parts and named P, Q, R and S. These four parts are not given in their proper order. Read the sentence/passage and find out which of the five combinations is correct. 1 - Elizabeth-Jane had perceived from Henchard's manner that in assenting to dance she had made a mistake of some kind. P - In her simplicity she did not know what it was till a hint from a nodding acquaintance enlightened her. Q - This made her very miserable, and she looked about for her mother; but Mrs. Henchard, who had less idea of conventionality than Elizabeth herself, had gone away, leaving her daughter to return at her own pleasure.  R - Thereupon her ears, cheeks, and chin glowed like live coals at the dawning of the idea that her tastes were not good enough for her position, and would bring her into disgrace.  S - As the Mayor's step-daughter, she learnt, she had not been quite in her place in treading a measure amid such a mixed throng as filled the dancing pavilion. 2 - The latter moved on into the dark dense old avenues, or rather vaults of living woodwork, which ran along the town boundary, and stood reflecting. 
Following are the shortilisting criteria for a candidates to be called for Interview for the post of Deputy Manager in an Insurance company. The candidate must (i) be at least 30 years and not more than 35 years as on 1st January, 2020. (ii) be a graduate in any discipline. (iii) have done MBA with specialisation in insurance with at least 75% marks. (iv)have at least one year post qualification work experience in an insurance company. (v) have secured at least 60% of marks in the screening test conducted by the company. (vi) a native of Maharashtra. However, if the applicant fulfills the above mentioned criteria except a) at (iv) above, the case may be referred to the General Manager of the company. b) at (v) above, the case may be referred to the Chief Manager of the company. c) at (vi) above but has studied Marathi as one subject in class 10, his case will be referred to Divisional Manager of the company. Rekha Kesharwani is 32 years old as on 1st Jan 2020. She has done B.Sc. from a university in Uttar Pradesh. She has done her post graduation in Business administration with a specialisation of Insurance from a reputed institute at Pune in 2016. She has scored 75% marks in the screening test conducted by the company. She is working as a development officer in LIC of India. What decision about Rekha Kesharwani can be taken on the basis of the information given above?
Eight members of a family – Archana, Suman, Dheeraj, Meghana, Bindu, Tilak, Rajan and Kiran are sitting in a straight line facing North. They have different ages – 12,17, 19, 22, 28, 31, 38 and 48 but not necessarily in the same order. Archana is sitting third to the right of the one who is 22 years old. Meghana and the one who is 22 years old are sitting together. One person is sitting between Kiran and one whose age is 48 years. The difference between the ages of Bindu and Kiran is 5 years. The one who is 10 years older than Meghana is sitting third to the right of Meghana. Rajan and Dheeraj are sitting together and one of them is sitting at the extreme end of the line. Dheeraj is 9 years older than Suman. Archana is sitting in the middle of Kiran and Tilak. Archana is 12 years younger than Dheeraj. Kiran is not 12 years old. Who is sitting third to the right of Meghana?
W, a married woman lived with her husband, along with a six month old baby, but her life was miserable as her husband frequently used to beat her. She wanted to go to her pursued but her husband threatened to beat her if she dares to do so. But one day when W was missing the husband perused her and found that she was going to her parents with the baby. When W turned around and found her husband running towards her, panic stricken she along with the baby jumped into a well. The baby died but she survived. She was prosecuted for the death of the baby. What offence if any has been committed by her?
Which of the following combinations are correctly matched?
1. Harbour ⇔ Section 51A, Indian Penal Code
2. Wrongful Loss ⇔ Section 23, Indian Penal Code
3. Gang rape on woman under twelve years of age ⇔ Section 376DB, Indian Penal Code
4. Gang rape ⇔ Section 376D, Indian Penal Code
Select the correct answer: