Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Under which Section of Indian Penal Code a hangman who hangs criminals in pursuant to the order of Judge under Indian Penal Code is exempted from criminal liability?

Under which Section of Indian Penal Code a hangman who hangs criminals in pursuant to the order of Judge under Indian Penal Code is exempted from criminal liability? Correct Answer None of the above

Related Questions

A hangman who hangs the prisoners pursuant to the order of the Court is exempted from criminal liability by virtue of Indian Penal Code under Section:
Consider the following statements:
1. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code requires two persons whereas Section 149 of Indian Penal Code require five persons.
2. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code requires common intention, whereas Section 149 of Indian Penal Code requires common object
3. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 149 of Indian Penal Code both require presence of a prior consent
4. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and section 149 of Indian Penal Code. Both create specific offence
Which of the above statements are correct?
Carefully read following statements:
1. According to Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, requirement is of two persons, whereas under Section 149 of Indian Penal Code, requirement is of five persons.
2. According to Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, common intention is required whereas under Section 149 Indian Penal Code, common object is required
3. Previous consent is required under Section 34 & 149 of Indian Penal Code
4. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 149 of Indian Penal Code constitutes a specific offence
Which of the above statements is true:
Which one of the following statements is correct?
A hangman who hangs the convict pursuant to the order of the court is exempted from criminal liability by virtue of
A hangman who hangs the prisoners pursuant to the order of the court is exempt from criminal liability by virtue of:
Statements : All terrorists are guilty. All terrorists are criminals.

Conclusions :
I. Either all criminals are guilty or all guilty are criminals.
II. Some guilty persons are criminals.
III. Generally criminals are guilty.
IV. Crime and guilt go together.
Two statements are followed by four conclusions. Assume the facts in the statement to be true and decide which of the conclusions follow? Statements: All Naxalites are guilty. All Naxalites are criminals. Conclusions: I. Either all criminal are guilty or all guilty are criminals II. Some guilty persons are criminals III. Generally criminals are guilty IV. Crime and guilt go together
Propositions as regards the liability of the surety under the surety bond are:
1. The liability of the surety is mutually exclusive of the liability of the accused under his personal bond.
2. The liability of the surety is contingent on the liability of the accused under his personal bond the liability of the surety.
3. is limited to the amount of the surety bond.
Now which of the following is correct
B, a man of unsound mind, sets fire to a dwelling house on A's instigation. Here, B is exempted from criminal liability (Section 84, Indian Penal Code), but A is guilty of abetting mischief by fire with intent to destroy the house. The principle for this criminal liability may be explained by which one of the following explanations?
Which of the following combinations are correctly matched?
1. Harbour ⇔ Section 51A, Indian Penal Code
2. Wrongful Loss ⇔ Section 23, Indian Penal Code
3. Gang rape on woman under twelve years of age ⇔ Section 376DB, Indian Penal Code
4. Gang rape ⇔ Section 376D, Indian Penal Code
Select the correct answer: