A' sets fire to a house to scare away the occupants. But the whole house was gutted and two occupants died. When charged with murder of two persons. 'A' defended saying that he has no intention to cause death. This was accepted by the Court. The Court's ruling can be said to be:

A' sets fire to a house to scare away the occupants. But the whole house was gutted and two occupants died. When charged with murder of two persons. 'A' defended saying that he has no intention to cause death. This was accepted by the Court. The Court's ruling can be said to be: Correct Answer Wrong: because 'A' had intention to cause fire which in all probability would have caused death

Related Questions

Atif is charged with the murder of Khuda Baksh on the 21st January, 1882. In fact, the murdered person's name was Haidar Baksh, and the date of the murder was the 20th January, 1882. Atif was never charged with any murder but one, and had heard the inquiry before the Magistrate, which referred exclusively to the case of Haidar Baksh. What will the Court infer from this while applying Section 215 Criminal Procedure Code?