In which one of the following decisions, the Supreme Court held that the power of posting a district judge under Article 233 does not include the power of transfer of such judge from one station to another and that the power of transfer of a district judge vested in the High Court under Article 235?

In which one of the following decisions, the Supreme Court held that the power of posting a district judge under Article 233 does not include the power of transfer of such judge from one station to another and that the power of transfer of a district judge vested in the High Court under Article 235? Correct Answer Chandra Mohan v. State of Uttar Pradesh

Related Questions

A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court passes judgment in a matter. In a later case before a high court, a party presents the Supreme Court judgment as a binding authority. The opposing party claims that the high court is not bound by the Supreme Court's judgment because relevant provisions of law were not brought to the notice of the Supreme Court in that case. Which of the following is most correct in this case?
Principle: Article 141 of the Constitution provides that the law declared by the Supreme Court is binding on all courts within the territory of India.