Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Consider the following statements: The High Court has jurisdiction to:
1. Punish for its contempt.
2. Tender advice on the legal question referred to it by the Governor of the State.
3. Tender advice on a legal question referred to it by the Governor of the state.
4. Issue certain writs for enforcement of Fundamental Rights or for other purposes.
Which of the statements given above are correct?

Consider the following statements: The High Court has jurisdiction to:
1. Punish for its contempt.
2. Tender advice on the legal question referred to it by the Governor of the State.
3. Tender advice on a legal question referred to it by the Governor of the state.
4. Issue certain writs for enforcement of Fundamental Rights or for other purposes.
Which of the statements given above are correct? Correct Answer 1 and 4

Related Questions

Consider the following statements :
The High Court has jurisdiction to:
1. Punish for its, contempt.
2. Tender advice on the legal question referred to it by the Governor of the State.
3. Tender advice on a legal question referred to it by the Governor of the State.
4. Issue certain writs for enforcement of Fundamental Rights or for other purposes.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
Consider the following statements: A high court has jurisdiction to (1) Punish for its contempt (2) Tender advice on a legal question referred by the President of India (3) Tender advice on a legal question referred by the Governor of the state. (4) Issue certain writs to protect fundamental rights Which of the above statement(s) is/are correct?
Study the following statements and pick up the correct code:
Statement I: The power of High Court to issue writs under Article 226 is wider than the power of Supreme Court under Article 32.
Statement II: The Supreme Court has the power to issue writs only for violation of fundamental rights whereas the power of High Court under Article 226 can be invoked for the enforcement of fundamental rights as well as legal rights.
With reference to the writ jurisdiction of a court, consider the following statements: 1. The high court can issue writs outside its territorial jurisdiction. 2. The writ jurisdiction of the high court is part of the basic structure of the constitution. 3. The high court can issue writs only in case of violation of a fundamental right. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Which of the following distinction(s) is/are not correct between public issue and rights issue? (A) In public issue, applications for shares are invited from the general public and in rights issue, the shares are offered to existing shareholders. (B) In public issue there is no question of any over-subscription and in rights issue the shares may be under subscribed or over subscribed leading to prorata allotment. (C) The price of public issue is generally less than the market price and in rights issue, the price is deliberately made less than the market price. (D) In a public issue, the communication of the issue is through prospectus or advertisements and in a rights issue the communication is between the company and the existing members of the company. Choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: State-run Energy Efficiency Services (EESL) has scrapped its second tender for procurement of 10,000 electric cars as the industry awaits clarification on specifications for chargers which will allow higher end, luxury automakers to come into the picture. This tender was floated in April and had been on hold after a preliminary pre-bid meeting. A similar tender was floated in August last year, and the rollout of 10,000 cars under the tender was expected to be completed by March 2019.  Why is EESL scraping the tender for procurement of 10,000 electric cars? Arguments: I. The share of luxury cars could go further up since it would be a good way of aggregating demand, Kumar said. This, however, strictly depends on the final order from DST. II. The tender had set aside 20% share of the total order for higher end and upgraded sedans category, which would allow foreign automakers like Nissan, Hyundai, Kia Motors to drive away with a fair share of the tender.  III. EESL said that the company has been awaiting clarification from the Department of Science & Technology (DST) to issue the standard norms for charging stations because of which the tender was first put on hold and now has been scrapped entirely.
What are the main provisions of constitutional remedies available to Indian citizens under the Indian Constitution? Select the correct answer using the following codes : (a) The citizens can move the courts for enforcement of their Fundamental Rights. (b) The Supreme Court can issue necessary writs for enforcement of these rights. (c) The Parliament can suspend the right to constitutional remedies by two-thirds majority, which must also be the majority of its total membership. (d) The parliament can empower the courts, other than the Supreme Court, to exercise powers for enforcement of these rights without adversely affecting the powers of the Supreme Court. 
Which of the following statement is correct? The supreme court can issue writs in matters related to the fundamental rights. The High court can issue writs in matters related to the fundamental rights as well as for other reasons.
Consider the following statements:
1. The powers of High Courts under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are wider than those of Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution of India.
2. Both High Court and Supreme Court have concurrent power to enforce the fundamental rights.
3. It is mandatory for a petitioner first to approach the High Court instead of approaching the Supreme Court directly for enforcement of fundamental rights.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
Consider the following statements regarding “Writs”: 1. The Supreme Court and the high courts can issue the writs. 2. Parliament can also empower any court to issue writs. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?