Under which Article of the Constitution can an individual move to the Supreme Court directly in case of any violation of Fundamental Rights?

Under which Article of the Constitution can an individual move to the Supreme Court directly in case of any violation of Fundamental Rights? Correct Answer Article-32

Remedies for enforcement of fundamental rights conferred by Part-III has been provided under Article-32 of constitution. This article provides the right to citizens to move directly to Supreme Court for enforcement of fundamntal rights and it gives Supreme Court, powers to issu write to enforce fundamental rights of an individual.
Bissoy MCQ

Related Questions

Under which of the following jurisdiction can any individual, whose fundamental right has been violated, can directly move the Supreme Court for remedy?
Under which Article of Indian Constitution a citizen can move to the Supreme Court of India if his Fundamental Rights are breached?
Under which Article of Indian Constitution, a person can move to a High Court if his Fundamental Rights are breached?
The right to move the Supreme Court for the enforcement of fundamental rights including the writs of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, certiorari and quo warranto are the parts of
Which Article of the constitution empowers the High court to issue writs including habeas corpus, mandamus, certiorari, prohibition and quo warranto for the enforcement of fundamental rights of the citizens and for any other purpose ?
______ writ is issued by a higher court (High Court or Supreme Court) when a lower court has considered a case going beyond its jurisdiction.
Under which of the following article of Indian constitution, the fundamental rights of defence forces' personnel can be restricted specially?
By which of the following rights fundamental rights are ensured in Indian constitution?
In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that fundamental rights are unamendable?
In which of the following matter the Supreme Court upheld the importance of fundamental rights over directive principles of state policy?