Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

In which of the following matter the Supreme Court upheld the importance of fundamental rights over directive principles of state policy?

In which of the following matter the Supreme Court upheld the importance of fundamental rights over directive principles of state policy? Correct Answer Minerava Mills Case

43rd Amendment Act 1976 through Article-31(C) gave precedence to all Directive Principles of State Policy over Fundamental Rights. Later on in Minerva Mills case 1980, Supreme Court struck down 42nd Amendment act related to Article-31(C) and upheld the imance of Fundamental Rights over DPSP except directives under Article-39(B) and 39(C) which are given primacy over Fundamental Rights under article-14. .

Related Questions

Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding the Directive Principles of the State Policy? A. In case of a conflict between the Directive Principles and Fundamental Rights, the Directive Principles shall prevail in the court. B. Fundamental rights are not unlimited and citizens are subject to reasonable restrictions. The Directive Principles are subject to any constitutional limitations.
The question below consists of a set of labelled sentences. These sentences, when properly sequenced form a coherent paragraph. Select the most logical order of sentences from among the options. P: These features demonstrate the legal superiority of the Fundamental Rights over Directive Principles. Q: Fundamental Rights are enforceable. R: These stand granted and guaranteed. S: As against these Directive Principles are non-enforceable principles which have been incorporated in the Constitution after the incorporation of the Fundamental Rights.
Whereas the 25th Amendment gave primacy to Directive Principles of State Policy contained in Article 39(b) and (c) over the Fundamental Rights in Articles 14, 19 or 31 of the Constitution of India, the 42nd Amendment gave precedence to all Directive Principles over the Fundamental Rights guaranteed in
The question below consists of a set of labelled sentences. These sentences, when properly sequenced form a coherent paragraph. Select the most logical order of sentences from among the options. P: These features clearly bring out the nature of the Indian Bill of Rights. Q: The Constitution grants and guarantees fundamental rights and freedom to all the people of India and constitute a vital pillar of Indian Democracy. R: No Law can violate the Fundamental Rights of the People of India. S: The fundamental rights incorporated in the Constitution stand at a higher pedestal than ordinary laws and the Directive Principles of State Policy.
Consider the following statements relating to Directive Principles of State Policy:
1. The Directive Principles of State Policy do not impose positive obligations on the State
2. So long as there is no law carrying out the Directives neither the State nor the individual can violate any existing law or right under the colour of following the directives
3. Courts are not competent to compel the Govt. to carry out any Directive Principle
Which of the above statements are correct?
A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court passes judgment in a matter. In a later case before a high court, a party presents the Supreme Court judgment as a binding authority. The opposing party claims that the high court is not bound by the Supreme Court's judgment because relevant provisions of law were not brought to the notice of the Supreme Court in that case. Which of the following is most correct in this case?
Principle: Article 141 of the Constitution provides that the law declared by the Supreme Court is binding on all courts within the territory of India.
Consider the following statements:
1. The powers of High Courts under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are wider than those of Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution of India.
2. Both High Court and Supreme Court have concurrent power to enforce the fundamental rights.
3. It is mandatory for a petitioner first to approach the High Court instead of approaching the Supreme Court directly for enforcement of fundamental rights.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
Which of the following statement is/are correct Fundamental Rights enjoy legal supremacy over Directive principles. The Parliament can amend the Fundamental Rights for implementing the Directive Principles. Choose the correct option given below
Statement No. 1: Directive Principles of State Policy are not enforceable by any Court.
Statement No. 2: Directive Principles of State Policy are fundamental in the governance of the country.
Study the following statements and pick up the correct code:
Statement I: The power of High Court to issue writs under Article 226 is wider than the power of Supreme Court under Article 32.
Statement II: The Supreme Court has the power to issue writs only for violation of fundamental rights whereas the power of High Court under Article 226 can be invoked for the enforcement of fundamental rights as well as legal rights.