Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Related Questions

In this question one statement is given followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true, even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statement. Indicate your answer. Statement: A physician who fails to enter the body of a patient with the lamp of knowledge and understanding can never treat diseases. Conclusion I: A physician with knowledge and understanding may be able to cure the patient. Conclusion II: A physician entering the patient’s body with the lamp of knowledge and understanding can always cure him.
E, F, G, H and K visit a hospital on week days. Each one of them is a physician, surgeon, dentist, cardiologist, nephrologist but in the random order. Each visits the hospital only one day in the week and attends to their profession only. Consider the following information and answer questions based on it. 1. The physician visits office every Monday.
2. E is the cardiologist who comes neither on Tuesday nor Thursday.
3. K is a surgeon and G is not the physician.
4. The person who visits the office on Thursday is not a nephrologist.
5. H works on a Tuesday and K works on the following day. Who is the nephrologist?
E, F, G, HandKvisit a hospital on week days. Each one of them is aphysician, surgeon, dentist, cardiologist, nephrologistbut in the random order. Each visits the hospital only one day in the week and attends to their profession only. Consider the following information and answer questions based on it. 1.The physician visits office every Monday.
2.E is the cardiologist who comes neither on Tuesday nor Thursday.
3.K is a surgeon and G is not the physician.
4.The person who visits the office on Thursday is not a nephrologist.
5.H works on a Tuesday and K works on the following day. Who is the physician?
Which of the following statements are correct in the context of Section 5 of Code of Civil Procedure?
1. Revenue Court is a part of Civil Court
2. Civil Court. means courts having original jurisdiction under Code of Civil Procedure but not Revenue Court
3. Civil Court means courts having original jurisdiction under Code of Civil Procedure including Revenue Court
4. Revenue Court is not a part of Civil Court
Name the celebrated physician in the court of King Bimbisara who was the personal physician of Lord Buddha himself.
Which of the following statements are correct? Answer by using the code given below:
1. Persons in Govt/Judicial service need not resign to participate in District judge selection process held in "Vijay Kumar Misra and another v. High Court of Judicature at Patna" by the Supreme Court of India
2. The Supreme Court of India held in S. Kazi v. Muslim Education Society that " All Tribunals are not necessary parties to the proceedings where legality of its orders challenged"
3. The Supreme Court of India observed in Cardanumom Marketing Corporation and others v. State of Kerala and others that Social Security to the legal profession becomes an essential part of legal system
4. The Supreme Court of India held in 'Union of India v. Rajasthan High Court and others that High Court judges are exempted from Airport frisking.
A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court passes judgment in a matter. In a later case before a high court, a party presents the Supreme Court judgment as a binding authority. The opposing party claims that the high court is not bound by the Supreme Court's judgment because relevant provisions of law were not brought to the notice of the Supreme Court in that case. Which of the following is most correct in this case?
Principle: Article 141 of the Constitution provides that the law declared by the Supreme Court is binding on all courts within the territory of India.
A decree was transferred for its execution from Court X to Court Y. Court Y is of the opinion that Court X committed an error when it calculated the limitation period. Court Y announced that it rectified the mistake of Court X and upheld the rule of law by pronouncing judgment in favour of judgment debtor. This was challenged by the decree holder in the appellate court. Predict whether the decree holder will win the case.
Where two or more courts have taken cognizance of the same offence and a question arises as to which of them ought to inquire into or try the offence, the question shall be decided
1. If the courts are subordinate to the same High Court, by that High Court
2. By the High Court within the local limits of whose appellate criminal jurisdiction the accused resides, carries on business or is engaged in a gainful employment
3. If the courts are subordinate to the same High Court, by that High Court in consultation with the State Government concerned
4. If the courts are not subordinate to the same High Court, by that court within the local limits of whose appellate criminal jurisdiction the proceedings were first commenced
Which of the above are correct?
E, F, G, HandKvisit a hospital on week days. Each one of them is aphysician, surgeon, dentist, cardiologist, nephrologistbut in the random order. Each visits the hospital only one day in the week and attends to their profession only. Consider the following information and answer questions based on it. 1.The physician visits office every Monday.
2.E is the cardiologist who comes neither on Tuesday nor Thursday.
3.K is a surgeon and G is not the physician.
4.The person who visits the office on Thursday is not a nephrologist.
5.H works on a Tuesday and K works on the following day. The cardiologist visits the office on