A fallacy where one tries to draw affirmative conclusion form the negative premise is the fallacy of

Consider the Assertion (A) and Reason (R) and select the correct answer:
Assertion (A) If one premise is particular, the conclusion must be particular.
Reason (R) (i) An affirmative particular has no distributed terms, and a negative particular has an only one.
(ii) The premises cannot both be particular and thus must differ in quantity.

A

A and R both are true but R (i) and (ii) correct explanations of A

B

A and R both are true but R (i) is correct explanation of A

C

A and R both are true but R (ii) is a correct explanation of A

D

A is true, but R (i) and (ii) are incorrect explanations of A

Given are the steps to construct an equilateral triangle, with help of a compass, when the length of altitude is given. Arrange the steps. i. Draw a line AB of any length. At any point P on AB, draw a perpendicular PQ equal to altitude length given ii. Draw bisectors of CE and CF to intersect AB at R and T respectively.QRT is required triangle iii. With center Q and any radius, draw an arc intersecting PQ at C iv. With center C and the same radius, draw arcs cutting the 1st arc at E and F

A

i, iii, iv, ii

B

iii, ii, iv, i

C

iv, iii, i, ii

D

ii, iii, iv, i

Arrange the steps. These give procedure to draw internal tangent to two given circles of equal radii. i. Draw a line AB which is the required tangent. ii. Draw the given circles with centers O and P. iii. With center R and radius RA, draw an arc to intersect the other circle on the other circle on the other side of OP at B. iv. Bisect OP in R. Draw a semi circle with OR as diameter to cut the circle at A.

A

ii, iv, iii, i

B

iv, i, iii, ii

C

iii, i, iv, ii

D

ii, iv, i, iii

Steps given are to draw an involute of a given triangle ABC. Arrange the steps. i. With C as centre and radius C1 draw arc cutting AC-extended at 2. ii. With A as center and radius A2 draw an arc cutting BA- extended at 3 completing involute. iii. B as centre with radius AB draw an arc cutting the BC- extended at 1. iv. Draw the given triangle with corners A, B, C.

A

ii, i, iv, iii

B

iii, i , iv, ii

C

i, iii, iv, ii

D

iv, iii, i, ii

Steps are given to draw normal and tangent to an archemedian curve. Arrange the steps, if O is the center of curve and N is point on it. i. Through N, draw a line ST perpendicular to NM. ST is the tangent to the spiral. ii. Draw a line OM equal in length to the constant of the curve and perpendicular to NO. iii. Draw the line NM which is normal to the spiral. iv. Draw a line passing through the N and O which is radius vector.

A

ii, iv, i, iii

B

i, iv, iii, ii

C

iv, ii, iii, i

D

iii, i, iv, ii

In this question, relationship between different elements is shown in the statement. This statement is followed by two conclusions: Statements: S ≤ L < U > M > B > E ≥ R Conclusion: i) S > M ii) L > E Choose the appropriate one from the following options A)Only conclusion i follows. B) Only conclusion ii follows. C) Either conclusion i or ii follows. D) Neither conclusion i nor ii follows. E) Both conclusion i and ii follow

A

B

C

D

A

Given are the steps to construct a square using a compass when the length of the side is given. Arrange the steps. i. Join A, B, C and D to form a square ii. At A with radius AB draw an arc, cut the AE at D iii. Draw a line AB with given length. At A draw a perpendicular AE to AB using arcs iv. With centers B and D and the same radius, draw arcs intersecting at C

A

i, iv, ii, iii

B

iii, ii, iv, i

C

iv, iii, i, ii

D

ii, iii, iv, i

The premise on which your conclusion is based is not valid.Choose the meaning of premise.

A

notion

B

promise

C

thesis

D

area

Which of the following is a valid assumption made in the viven argument?Premise I: People who wear glasses are smart.Premise II: John wears glasses.Conclusion: John is smart.

A

All people who wear glasses are smart.

B

Only people who wear glasses are smart

C

John is the only person who wears glasses

D

None of the above.

Consider the following argument: Major Premise: No squares are rectangles Minor Premise: All rectangles are circles Conclusion: Some circles are not squares What is the Mood of the above proposition ?

A

A I E

B

A E O

C

E A O

D

E A I

A fallacy where one tries to draw affirmative conclusion form the negative premise is the fallacy of

Related Questions