Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Related Questions

From the following two premises which conclusions could be validly drawn from the premises: Premises: 1. All cats are dogs 2. All dogs are cows Conclusions: a. All cats are cows b. Some cows are cats c. All dogs are cats d. No cow is dog Select the correct code:
The proposition ‘All birds are cows’ is equivalent to which of the following propositions? a) Some cows are birds b) Some cows are not non-birds c) Some birds are cows d) Many birds are cows
Two statements are given followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements ? Statements: All dogs are cats. All cats are cows. Conclusions: I. Some cows are dogs. II. All dogs are cows
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow from the statements Statements: All ducks are tigers. All tigers are monkeys. All monkeys are cows. Conclusions: I. All tigers are cows. II. All monkeys are ducks. III. All ducks are cows. IV. All cows are tigers.
Assume that the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with generally established facts, decide which conclusion(s) logically and definitely follow(s) from the information given in the statements. Statements: 1) Some cats are goats. 2) All goats are cows. Conclusion: I. All cows are goats. II. Some cats are cows.
Statements : Some dogs are cows. Some cows are cats.

Conclusions :
I. All dogs being cats is a possibility.
II. Some cats are dogs.
Consider the given statements and decide which of the given conclusions do NOT follow from the statements. Statements: All Bulls are Black but not Cows. All Cows are Black. Conclusions: 1. Some Cows are Bulls. 2. All Blacks are Cows. 3. All Blacks are Bulls.
Given below are two premises with four conclusions drawn from them (taking singly or together). Which of the following conclusions could be validly drawn from the premises? Premises:  i) All cats are animals. ii) Birds are not cats. Conclusions: a) Birds are not animals. b) Cats are not Birds. c) All animals are cats. d) Some animals are cats.
No cats are flying creatures.
Some domestic animals are not cats.
∴ Some domestic animals are not flying creatures.
This syllogism has the fallacy of
In the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion/conclusions logically follows/follow the given statements. Statements: (A) Some cars are guns. (B) All horses are guns. (C) All guns are cows. Conclusions: I. Some cows are cars. II. Some cows are horses. III. Some cows are guns.