Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

The engagement diamond ring of 'N' was stolen by 'T', a thief who sold it to 'J' a jeweller. 'N' filed a suit for recovery of ring against 'J'. 'J' contended that he is ready to pay the price of the ring. Whether the decree for recovery of diamond ring can be refused on the ground that

The engagement diamond ring of 'N' was stolen by 'T', a thief who sold it to 'J' a jeweller. 'N' filed a suit for recovery of ring against 'J'. 'J' contended that he is ready to pay the price of the ring. Whether the decree for recovery of diamond ring can be refused on the ground that Correct Answer None of these

Related Questions

Each of the question below consists of a question and three statements number I, II and III given below it. You have to decide whether the data provided in the statement are sufficient to answer the question. A bag contains some number of Diamond of 4 different colors (Red, Pink, blue and yellow). What is the total number of Diamond in the bag? I. If 5 Pink Diamond from the bag are replaced by Yellow Diamond, Then the ratio of probabilities of picking 2 yellow Diamond at a time to picking 3 Blue Diamond at a time becomes (1/116). II. The different between probabilities of picking 2 Red Diamonds at a time and probability of picking 2 Blue Diamonds at a time is (23/330). III. If a Diamond is picked from the bag, then there is 40% chance that it is a red Diamond. Probability of picking 2 Red Diamond from the bag is (26/165).
In a suit for partition, a Memorandum of Family Settlement is filed and on this basis the partition suit is decreed, but even after disposal of the suit the original Memorandum of Family Settlement remains in the file of the partition suit, then in such situation whether in a suit for eviction by one of the original co-owner of a tenant of a shop of the joint property which has fallen to the share of that co-owner as per the decree passed on the Memorandum of Family Settlement, can the certified copy of the Memorandum of Family Settlement be filed and proved as a public document in the suit against the tenant?
A jeweller made a piece of uniquely designed diamond necklace and the selling price was fixed at Rs. 10,00,000. In making this piece, on the raw material, the jeweller had invested Rs. 3,00,000 and had paid a labour charge of Rs. 2,00,000. If 20% of the raw material cost was of gold, what is the actual amount the jeweller had spent in procuring the gold?
To constitute a matter of res judicata which of the following conditions must concur?
1. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit or issue must be the same matter which was directly and substantially in issue either actually (section 11, explanation III) or constructively (section 11, explanation IV) in the former suit
2. The former suit must have been a suit between the same parties under whom they or any of them claim. Explanation VI of Section 11 must be read with this condition
3. The parties as aforesaid must have litigated under the same title in the former suit
4. The court which decided the former suit must have been a court competent to try the subsequent suit of the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised. Explanation II of section 11 is to be read with condition
5. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit must have been heard and finally decided by the court in the first suit. Explanation V of section 11 is to be read with this condition
A delivers his watch to Z, a jeweller, to be regulated. Z carries it to his shop. A, not owing to the jeweller any debt for which the jeweller might lawfully detain the watch as a security, enters the shop openly, takes his watch by force out of Z's hand, and carries it away.
In a suit filed by the plaintiff, the defendant in his written statement has taken the objection of non-impleadment of necessary party. Despite such objection the plaintiff continued the suit and the suit finally was decreed. At the first appellate stage, the plaintiff withdraws the suit with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action and subsequently filed a fresh suit. The period spent by the plaintiff in the earlier suit, under section 14 of Limitation Act is
X sues A and B on a promissory note executed by A, B is A's nephew, and he is joined as a defendant on the ground that A and B are member of a joint Hindu family, and that the note was for a debt binding on the family. None of the defendant appears at the hearing and an ex parte decree is passed against both the defendants.
The decree against A proceeds on the ground that the note was passed by him and against B on the ground that the debt was incurred for a family purpose. B applies for an order to set aside the decree, alleging that the summons was not served upon him and that the debt in respect of which the note was passed by A was not incurred for a family purpose. It is not disputed that the amount was actually advanced to A.
A jeweller sold a necklace for Rs. 2.5 lakhs. The rates increased in a certain year and he sold another set of the same necklace which he bought at 2 lakhs at 4 lakhs. The cost price of both the necklaces were same for jeweller. Find his profit percentage. 
A thief is spotted by a policeman from a distance of 400 meters. When the policeman started running after the thief, the thief also started running. Assuming the speed of the thief to be 8 km/h and that of the policeman is 10 km/h, how far will the thief have run before he is overtaken by the policeman?
A thief is spotted by a policeman from a distance of 500 m. When the policeman started running after the thief, the thief also started running. Assuming the speed of the thief to be 20 km/hr, and that of the policeman 25 km/hr, how far will the thief run before he is caught by the policeman?