Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

In cases where a document proved to be thirty years old is produced from proper custody, which of the following presumptions will the court make?

In cases where a document proved to be thirty years old is produced from proper custody, which of the following presumptions will the court make? Correct Answer The court may presume that the signature and handwriting is the signature and handwriting of the person to be and was duly executed and attested

Related Questions

A document was in the joint possession of X and Y. In a suit between Y and Z, Z requested the court for the discovery of that document. Y informed the court about the nature of the document and also stated that X is not consenting to produce the document. Z requested the court to compel Y for the production of the document as it is in the joint possession. Decide whether the court will compel Y for the production of the document.
A' document is said to be in the handwriting of 'A'. That document is produced from proper custody. If the document is purporting or proved to be-
Thirty years old document is produced from a proper custody,
For the Court to make the presumption as mentioned in Section 90 of the Evidence Act about the document produced before it, such document must be purported or proved to be . . . . . . . . years old.
Due execution of a document more than thirty years old coming from proper custody, is a:
How many years old electronic record will be deemed to be proved, if it is produced from any custody which the court in the particular case considers proper?
Regarding bail applications, a Bench comprising of Justice A. K. Goel and Justice U. U. Lalit of the Supreme Court of India has asked all High Courts to issue directions to their Subordinate Courts that
1. All bail applications normally be disposed of by judicial officers within one week.
2. Magisterial trial where accused is in custody be concluded within six months.
3. Session trial where accused is in custody normally be concluded within two years.
4. Efforts to be made to dispose of all cases, which are ten years old, by the end of the year.
5. The above timelines may, however, will not be the touchstone for assessment of judicial performance in annual confidential reports
“If we pretend to respect the artist at all, we must allow him his freedom of choice, in the face, in particular cases, of innumerable presumptions that the choice will not fructify. Art derives a considerable part of its beneficial exercise from flying in the face of presumptions.”
Proposition of the Law of Evidence is that
1. Proceedings of Legislature may be proved by the records certified by a member present in the proceedings.
2. Acts of the Central Government may be proved by the records of the department, certified by heads of the departments.
3. Acts of the state may be proved by the document purporting to be printed by the order of such Government.
4. Acts of the State Government may be proved by records of the department certified by the head of the corresponding department of the Central Government.
Eight members of a family – Archana, Suman, Dheeraj, Meghana, Bindu, Tilak, Rajan and Kiran are sitting in a straight line facing North. They have different ages – 12,17, 19, 22, 28, 31, 38 and 48 but not necessarily in the same order. Archana is sitting third to the right of the one who is 22 years old. Meghana and the one who is 22 years old are sitting together. One person is sitting between Kiran and one whose age is 48 years. The difference between the ages of Bindu and Kiran is 5 years. The one who is 10 years older than Meghana is sitting third to the right of Meghana. Rajan and Dheeraj are sitting together and one of them is sitting at the extreme end of the line. Dheeraj is 9 years older than Suman. Archana is sitting in the middle of Kiran and Tilak. Archana is 12 years younger than Dheeraj. Kiran is not 12 years old. Who is sitting third to the right of Meghana?