Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Related Questions

Stalking for a second or subsequent conviction attracts a punishment of
The offence of Stalking upon first conviction is
The offence of Voyeurism upon second or subsequent conviction is
To prove both the parts of the offence contemplated in Section 116 of the Indian Penal Code, which of the following must be proved by the prosecution?
1. To prove the first part, the accused did abet the offence either by instigation or by conspiracy or by intentional aiding or by illegal omission.
2. To prove the first part, the offence was such which is punishable with imprisonment.
3. To prove the second part, the person abetted was a public servant during the period he was abetted.
4. To prove the second part, it was the duty of such public servant to prevent the commission of such an offence.
Under SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, how must punishment shall be given for second or any other subsequent conviction for the offence of atrocities?
To constitute a matter of res judicata which of the following conditions must concur?
1. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit or issue must be the same matter which was directly and substantially in issue either actually (section 11, explanation III) or constructively (section 11, explanation IV) in the former suit
2. The former suit must have been a suit between the same parties under whom they or any of them claim. Explanation VI of Section 11 must be read with this condition
3. The parties as aforesaid must have litigated under the same title in the former suit
4. The court which decided the former suit must have been a court competent to try the subsequent suit of the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised. Explanation II of section 11 is to be read with condition
5. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit must have been heard and finally decided by the court in the first suit. Explanation V of section 11 is to be read with this condition
If an accused is charged of a major offence, but on the facts established he cannot be held guilty of that major offence. At the same time the facts established indicates that the minor offence has been committed, the person so tried for major offence can be convicted for such minor offence, it has been so provided
Under which section of IT Act, 2000, the following punishment is mentioned?
'3 years of imprisonment and/or 5 lakh rupees penalty for first conviction and 5 years of imprisonment and/or 10 lakh rupees penalty for second conviction'
Voyeurism for second or subsequent conviction attracts a punishment of
What is the punishment for a second or subsequent conviction in 'Voyeurism'?