Moses v. Macferlan (1555-1774) is a case relating to

Moses v. Macferlan (1555-1774) is a case relating to Correct Answer Theory of unjust enrichment

Moses v. Macferlan is a landmark case in the realm of contract law. It is relevant to the concept of unjust enrichment. The case deals with the restitution of money paid under a void contract, where one party has received a benefit but is not entitled to keep the money due to the invalidity of the contract.

Option A is correct:
A. Theory of unjust enrichment
The case of Moses v. Macferlan contributed significantly to the development of the theory of unjust enrichment, which is based on the principle that a person should not retain a benefit that is unjustly acquired at the expense of another.

Options B, C, and D are incorrect:
B. The right of lien - The right of lien refers to the right of a person to retain possession of another person's property until a debt owed to the possessor is paid.
C. Test of agency - The test of agency is concerned with determining the legal relationship between a principal and an agent, where the agent acts on behalf of the principal.
D. Doctrine of frustration - The doctrine of frustration relates to situations where an unforeseen event occurs, rendering the performance of a contract impossible or radically different.

Therefore, the correct answer is:
A. Theory of unjust enrichment

Related Questions

The case of Moses v. MacFerlan deals with which of the following?
Find the part of the sentence that contains an error. Rabbinic tradition's understanding is that all of the teachings found in Torah were given by God through the prophet Moses.