Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Consider the given statement as true and decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements. Statement :
All rivers are holy. All gods are holy. Conclusions:
1. All rivers are gods.
2. All gods are rivers.

Consider the given statement as true and decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements. Statement :
All rivers are holy. All gods are holy. Conclusions:
1. All rivers are gods.
2. All gods are rivers. Correct Answer Neither 1 or 2 follows

Related Questions

Consider the given statement as true and decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements: Statement: All rivers are holy. All gods are holy. Conclusion: 1. All rivers are gods. 2. All gods are rivers.
Consider the given statement to be true and decide which of the conclusions logically follows (s) from the statements. Statements: Some angels are gods. All living being are gods. Conclusions: 1. Some gods are angels. 2. Some living beings are gods.
Two statements are given, followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All nurses are gods. Some nurses are doctors. Conclusions: I. Some gods are nurses. II. Some doctors are gods.
In the question given below are given two statements followed by a few conclusions a option. You have to take the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions basically follows from the tow given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: A. All rivers are clouds B. Some animals are rivers Conclusion: 1. Some rivers are animals 2. Some clouds are rivers 3. All clouds are rivers 4. All animals are clouds A. Conclusion 1 and 2 follow B. Conclusion 1, 2 and 3 follow C. Conclusion 1 and 3 follow D. Conclusion 2, 3 and 4 follow
Two statements are followed by three Conclusions I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements and indicate your answer accordingly. Statements: I. After a Pay Commission bonanza of 2% hike in dearness allowance in March, central government employees and pensioners can expect another round of salary increase with the government set to modify the index and base year for calculating dearness allowance.  II. The labour ministry is working on a new series of consumer price index for industrial workers (CPI-IW), which is used to determine dearness allowance (DA).  Conclusions: I. DA is a cost of living adjustment allowance paid to government employees, public sector employees and pensioners in the country. It is calculated as a percentage of an employee’s basic salary to mitigate the impact of inflation on people.  II. Since theindex is used to determine dearness allowance of all government employees and industrial workers there may be significant financial implication. III. The trend so far is that the weightage of transport, healthcare and housing has gone up many fold in the new series in the monthly expenditure of an industrial worker, especially consumption of petrol and diesel with the addition of cars to it, while there is decline in overall food basket which is being diversified.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the Two statements are given followed by three conclusions numbered I, II and III. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: 1. All tanks are rivers. 2. All rivers are mountains. Conclusions: I. Some mountains are rivers. II. Some tanks are not mountains. III. Some mountains are tanks.
In the question below, two statements and some of their conclusions are given as alternatives. You have to follow both the given statements correctly, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions basically follows the given statements, regardless of the commonly known facts. Statements: 1. All stars are planets 2. All planets are moons Conclusion: 1. All moons are planets 2. Some planets are stars 3. Some moons are stars 4. All planets are stars A. Conclusions 1, 3 and 4 follow B. Conclusions 2 and 3 follow C. Conclusions 1, 2 and 3 follow D. All conclusions follow
Two statements are followed by two Conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements and indicate your answer accordingly. Statements: I. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has sought information on offshore investments by directors of RNT Associates, a closely held firm which functions as a family office and investment vehicle of Ratan Tata.  II. The ED order, dated June 14, also calls for details of investments or loans from RNT Associates and its directors to a Singapore-based entity, RNT Associates Ltd. Conclusions: The order is under provisions of the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) and the documents are being sought for the purpose of investigation under FEMA. The nature of queries from Enforcement Directorate is related to RNT Associates’ investment portfolio. It is compliant with all disclosures and existing laws governing investments and is extending all cooperation.
In this question two statements and two conclusions i and ii have been given. You have to consider both the conclusions by considering the statement as true and deciding which conclusions are logically logical beyond any doubt. Statement: All balls are bat. All bats are rubber. Conclusion: i) All balls are rubber. ii) There are some rubber balls. Select the correct option from the given options. (A) Only conclusions i is logical (B) Only conclusions ii is rational (C) or conclusions i or ii is rational (D) nor the conclusions ii is rational (E) both the conclusions i and ii are rational
Two statements are followed by three Conclusions I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements and indicate your answer accordingly. Statements: I. Milk supply in Maharashtra was badly hit after thousands of dairy farmers launched a protest on Monday, demanding better price and subsidy of Rs 5 per litre. Tankers supplying milk to major cities including Mumbai, Pune, Nagpur, Nashik and others were blocked early morning leading to sudden crisis.  II. The agriculture ministry had mooted a proposal asking railways to make milk available at railway stations and at the meeting, sources said representatives from Amul India suggested that the national transporter could provide stalls to dairy companies or cooperatives where they could sell their products.  Conclusions: I. Representatives of Amul India and food safety body FSSAI are willing to discuss issues and concerns of the dairy sector in the backdrop of the farmers agitation in Maharashtra that had led to severe shortage of milk in the state.  II. The farmers' groups and Maharashtra Kisan Sabha, are demanding a GST waiver on butter and milk powder apart from the subsidy. III. Railways is drawing up a plan to make milk available at railway stations across the country to promote its consumption.