Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Statement 1: Ham is from pork bellies. Bacon is from pork thighs. Statement 2: Corned Beef is strips of beef cooked and cured in cans. It is the major export product of India.

Statement 1: Ham is from pork bellies. Bacon is from pork thighs. Statement 2: Corned Beef is strips of beef cooked and cured in cans. It is the major export product of India. Correct Answer False, True

Statement 1 is supposed to be Bacon is from pork bellies. Ham is from pork thighs.

Related Questions

Consider the following question followed by the statements and decide which of the statements is sufficient to answer the question. Question: 8 trolleys in a supermarket are used to load and unload commodities. All of the trolleys have been filled with oil cans of two different sizes and shapes. How many cans are loaded in the trolleys in total? Statements: 1. The shape of 8 cans are such that in one trolley only 2 can fit. 2. The rest of the trolleys are filled with 4 oil cans each.
A 40 cm long paper strip was cut into two strips in the ratio 5 ∶ 3. The longer strip was further divided into two strips in the ratio 4 ∶ 1, while the smaller strip was also divided into two strips in the ratio 3 ∶ 2. What is the difference between the lengths of the two shortest strips?
Which of the following statements about gene therapy are correct?
P. Affected individuals, but not their progeny, can be cured through germline gene therapy.
Q. Affected individuals, as well as their progeny, can be cured through germline gene therapy.
R. Affected individuals, but not their progeny, can be cured through somatic gene therapy.
S. Affected individuals, as well as their progeny, can be cured through somatic gene therapy.
Which of the following statement (s) is/are true about the following eliminations? (1) Hoffmann product is major product in I (2) Saytzeff product is major product in I (3) Hoffmann product is major product in II (4) Saytzeffproduct is major product in II
In the question below, are given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the suggested course of action logically follow (s) for pursuing. Statement: Commerce and industry minister Suresh Prabhu will next week review sector-specific strategies to increase India’s exports 20% this year amid an uncertain global trade environment and credit availability. The ministry has identified nine sectors, including gems & jewellery, leather, textiles, agriculture and pharmaceuticals, to drive India’s exports to $400 billion in the next five years. These sectors accounted for $242 billion or 80% of the country’s total exports of $302 billion in 2017-18. Courses of action: I. The minister will review the action plans on October 1. This is in continuation of the series of meetings that he has had with export promotion councils and secretaries of line ministries concerned. II. Besides export promotion councils, the minister will separately meet officials of other departments concerned.  III. Exporters have raised concerns over the slack flow of credit to exporters, high goods and services tax on gold and strict pollution norms for chemicals, besides currency fluctuations, citing these factors as hindrances to export growth. Prabhu recently wrote to finance minister Arun Jaitley, requesting his intervention to improve bank credit flow to the export sector.
Consider the following statements with respect to the Export Preparedness Index, 2020: 1. It was published by the NITI Aayog in partnership with the Institute of Competitiveness. 2. It examines the export ecosystem of Indian States and Union Territories. 3. Policy, Business Ecosystem, Export Ecosystem and Export Performance are the four pillars of the Export Preparedness Index. 4. Gujarat emerged as the top-performing State in the 'Coastal States' category, followed by Kerala and Tamil Nadu. 5. In the category of 'Landlocked States', Madhya Pradesh is the best-performing State. Among 'Himalayan States' and 'City-States' Himachal Pradesh and Delhi are the top-performing States respectively. Which of the above statements are true?
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: India has constituted a group to study the Special Economic Zones (SEZ) policy of India. The group will evaluate the SEZ policy and suggest measures to cater to the needs of exporters in the present economic scenario. This comes after the United States challenged India’s entire set of export subsidy programs in the WTO. Why is the United States unhappy with India? Arguments: I. Under the TIES, in 2017-18, exports recorded a growth of about 10 percent to USD 303 billion. II. According to them, India’s export subsidies do not let the developers of India have full freedom of subcontracting, importing without license, etc. III. According to them, India appears to be providing subsidies through various export promotion programs, SEZs, etc. which is harming their companies.
In a question below is given a statement. An assumption is something supposed or taken for granted. You have to consider the following assumption and decide which of the assumption is implicit in the statement. Statement: "Government of State X's state, according to which it has been decided to provide a cooked meal to the students of all primary schools of the states, is not a proper and judicious step." — Criticism by a person. Assumption: I. Student may hesitate to eat the cooked meal provided by the Government. II. The cooked meal served to the students may be hazardous for the health of students. 
Suppose you have Tk. 500 to spend on beef and chicken . Beef cost Tk. 110 per kg and chicken cost Tk. 85 per kg. If you increase consumption of beef by 3 kg how much you should decrease the consumption of chicken?
In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I: Some ribbons are tapes. Statement II: Some strips are ribbons. Conclusion I: All tapes are strips. Conclusion II: No strips are tapes.