Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Related Questions

Low quality of jute fibre is attributed to
1. Discoloration of fibre
2. Very short fibre strands
3. Reduction of cellulose in fibre
4. Reduction of cell wall strength over-retting decreases the fibre quality due to
Select the correct answer:
Which one of the following statement is/are incorrect with respect to fibre intake in animals? 1. Forage dry matter consumption should be near 2% of the body weight. 2. At least 21-25% acid detergent fibre should be in the total ration. 3. At least 28-30% neutral detergent fibre should be in the total ration. 4. Provide at least 3 Kg of fibre a day.
A glass fibre reinforced epoxy composite is made with 60 wt.% unidirectional continuous glass fibres. The elastic moduli of the glass fibre and the epoxy matrix are 72.5 and 2.4 GPa, respectively. What is the elastic modulus of this composite along the fibre direction, in GPa? The densities of glass fibre and epoxy are 2.58 g/cm3 and 1.14 g/cm3, respectively
Consider the following statements.
1. Fibre optics is based on the principle of total internal reflection.
2. In an optical fibre communication system, power consumption is extremely low
3. Optical fibre communications are free from radio frequency interference.
4. In India, Reliance Group of Industries is engaged in the manufacture of the optical fibre.
Which of these statements are correct?
Which one is incorrect match:-   TITRATION INDICATOR 1) Strong acid v/s strong base Phenolphthalein & methyl Orange 2) Weak acid v/s strong base Phenolphthalein 3) Strong acid v/s weak base Methyl orange 4) Weak acid v/s weak base Methyl Red
Two statements are given, followed by a conclusion based upon them. Choose the alternative which best applies to the given conclusion. Statements: I. Some students are weak in science. II. All those, who are weak in science, are athletes. Conclusion: Some athletes are weak in science. The conclusion drawn is :
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below if followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should banks provide special loans to farmers? Arguments: I. Yes, as with that amount the farmer would be able to afford modern equipment’s which will increase his earnings. II. No, because people may take advantage of this, even those who can afford to pay may not.
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below if followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should the government provide shelter for the homeless? Arguments: I. Yes, the municipal government should take some responsibility of supporting people who aren’t in a position to support themselves. II. No, because the government should help these people to get back on their feet and become self-sufficient by providing job opportunities so that they will be capable of providing shelter for themselves.
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below if followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should minimum deposits be banned to open an account in a bank? Arguments: I. Yes, because people who aren’t making enough money can also open a bank account to save their earnings. II. No, because bank has to pay overhead to run branches, maintain accounts and more thus requires minimum deposits.
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below if followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should government ban Cigarette industries? Arguments: I. Yes, as it is very injurious for any person consuming them and causes cancer. II. No, forbidding them would mean that those people who work in cigarette industries would lose their jobs.