Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Related Questions

Arrange the following activities with regard to rehabilitation in industries.
1. Assessment of feasibility
2. Assessment of additional funds
3. Preparation of cash flow statements
4. Arrangement of funds with other creditors
5. Marketing arrangement
6. Arrangement for disposal of unwanted assets and recovery of over due debts
7. Arrangement with various financial institutions
8. Arrangement fir Management Performance
Recently, the USA decided to support India's membership in multilateral export control regimes called the "Australia Group" and the "Wassenaar Arrangement". What is the difference between them? 1. The Australia Group is an informal arrangement which aims to allow exporting countries to minimize the risk of assisting chemical and biological weapons proliferation, whereas the Wassenaar Arrangement is a formal group under the OECD holding identical objectives. 2. The Australia Group comprises predominantly of Asian, African and North American countries, whereas the member countries of Wassenaar Arrangement are predominantly from the European Union and American continents. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? 
Consider the following statements in connection with deflection-type and null-type instruments: 1. Null-type instruments are more accurate than the deflection-type ones. 2. Null-type of instrument can be highly sensitive compared to a deflection-type instrument. 3. Under dynamic conditions, null-type instruments are less preferred to deflection-type instruments. 4. Response is faster in null-type instruments as compared to deflection-type instruments. Which of the above statements are correct?
Which of the following activities should be shown separately in the cash flow statement prepared as per Accounting Standard-3?
1. Cash flow from borrowing activities
2. Cash flow from operating activities
3. Cash flow from financing activities
4. Cash flow from investing activities
5. Cash flow from miscellaneous activitie
Which of the following activities should be shown separately in the cash flow statement prepared as per accounting standard-3?
I. Cash flow from borrowing activities.
II. Cash flow from operating activities.
III. Cash flow from financing activities.
IV. Cash flow from investing activities.
V. Cash flow from miscellaneous activities.
Consider the following grammar and the semantic actions to support the inherited type declaration attributes. Let X1, X2, X3, X4, X5 and X6 be the placeholders for the non-terminals D, T, L or L1 in the following table: Production rule Semantic action D → T L X1.type = X2.type T → int T.type = int T → float T.type = float L → L1, id X3.type = X4.type addType(id.entry, X5.type) L → id addType(id.entry, X6.type)   Which one of the following are the appropriate choices for X1, X2, X3 and X4?
Which of the following points are correct regarding the electronic configuration? A. It is the arrangement of electrons in the shells of an atom. B. It is the arrangement of electrons in the subshells. C. It is the arrangement of electrons in the orbitals of an atom.
A number-arrangement machine, when given an input string of numbers, arranges them following a particular pattern. The following is the illustration of an input and its arrangement. Input: 3 4 9 7 6 11 Step I 9 16 81 49 36 121 Step II 12 20 90 56 42 132 Step III 17 25 95 61 47 137 Step IV 15 23 93 59 45 135   As per the rules followed in the above steps, find the appropriate answer What is the input if the following is the arrangement of Step IV? 9, 75, 113, 213, 33, 5
Letters in a seven-letter English word ABSCOND is rearranged in such a way that for any of the letters neither of the neighbours is same as in the previous arrangement. Only S and O remain at their previous positions. B and N are not adjacent to each other in the new arrangement. How many letters are between A and D in the new arrangement?
Consider the following grammar (that admits a series of declarations, followed by expressions) and the associated syntax directed translation (SDT) actions, given as pseudo-code: P → D* E* D → int ID {record that ID.lexeme is of type int} D → bool ID { record that ID.lexeme is of type bool} E → E1 + E2 {check that E1.type = E2.type = int; set E.type := int} E → !E1 {check that E1.type = bool; set E.type := bool} E → ID {set E.type := int} With respect to the above grammar; which one of the following choices is correct?