Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Related Questions

Rule: Courts are under an obligation to inform the parties where an appeal lies. A lower court judge pronounced a judgment after hearing lengthy arguments from plaintiff's and defendant's advocates. He did not inform the parties about the period of limitation for filing an appeal under latest amendment. The plaintiff failed to appeal on time and requested the higher court for condonation of delay on the ground that the lower court judge failed to fulfil his obligation as he was not informed about the appeal. Will the higher court consider this ground as sufficient cause for condonation of delay?
Which of the following instances can be held to be final orders?
1. An order of a High Court dismissing an appeal for the appellant's failure to furnish order
2. An order that an appeal had abated
3. An order in a revision reversing the dismissal of a suit and restoring it to the file of the lower court when such an order had the effect of reinstating a primary decree
4. An order refusing an application under section 45 of the Specific Relief Act 1 of 1877
5. An order passed by a High Court in insolvency proceedings
In the following sentence, a part of the sentence is underlined. Below are given alternatives to the underlined part, which may improve the sentence. Choose the correct alternative. In case no improvement is needed, choose the alternative that indicates No improvement needed. Indian singer Zubeen Garg would be honoured with the 'Hero to Animals Award' from People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) India from his recent appeal to end animal sacrifice at the Kamakhya Temple in Assam. (A) For his recent appeal (B) To his recent appeal (C) On his recent appeal
The question below is followed by three statements I, II and III. You have to determine whether the data given is sufficient for answering the question. You should use the data and your knowledge of mathematics to choose the best possible answer. How many runs Sachin scored against Kashmir? I. The difference between his score against Mumbai and against Delhi is equal to the difference between the score against Delhi and against Kashmir. II. The average run he scored against all three states Delhi, Kashmir and Mumbai is 100. III. He scored 25 runs more against Mumbai than Kashmir.
In one trial, X is convicted against which no appeal lies, whereas conviction against Y is appealable. Whether X can file an appeal against his conviction?
Assertion (A): Where any special or local law prescribes for any suit appeal or application a period of limitation different from period prescribed by the Schedule, the provisions of Section 3 of Limitation Act, 1963 shall apply as if such period were the period prescribed by the schedule.
Reason (R): Where a Special Law prescribes a period of limitation for filing appeal but there is no provision therefore under Limitation Act, 1963, the period of limitation provided under the Special Law must be treated to be different from that under the Limitation Act.
What is the time limit for filing appeal against the order of Cyber appellate tribunal?
During the pendency of an appeal by the four defendants in the suit, one of the appellants (defendants) dies and no steps for substitution of his legal representatives are taken and the appeal in so far as it relates to the said appellant abates. The five respondents (plaintiffs) apply for dismissal of the entire appeal as abated. Answer whether:
Section 19A of the Consumer Protection Act provides that State and National Commissions shall hear as expeditiously as possible and an endeavour shall he made to finally dispose of the appeal within ninety days from the date of its admission. The Section further empowers the Commissions to make following orders; answer by using below:
(1) Ordinarily grant no adjournment unless sufficient cause
(2) To impose costs occasioned by adjournment
(3) Record the reason for delay while disposing of the appeal
(4) Dispose of the appeal ex parte
Which of the following statement is correct?
1. An appeal may lie from an original decree passed ex parte
2. No appeal shall lie from a decree passed by the Court with the consent of parties
3. No appeal shall lie on a question of law