Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

What will be the time complexity of update query operation in an array of size n when we use square root optimization?

What will be the time complexity of update query operation in an array of size n when we use square root optimization? Correct Answer O(1)

The time complexity of query operation remains the same in both square root optimized code and non optimized code. We simply find the chunk in which the update requires to be performed and then add the new updated value at the desired index.

Related Questions

Given below are three quantities named 1, 2 and 3. Based on the given information, you have to determine the relationship between the three quantities. You should use the given data and knowledge of Mathematics to choose between the possible answer. Quantity 1: Area of the innermost square. A square is made by joining the midpoints of a square of area 200 sq. m. The outermost square is called Square 1, The square inside it is called Square 2. The next square is made by joining midpoints of square 2 and is called Square 3. This process goes on. Square 5 is the innermost square. Quantity 2: A man starts with a speed of 10 km/hr. He increases his speed by 10 km/hr every hour at the start and drives at the same speed for that hour. If he traveled a total distance of 550 km. Find the time Quantity 3: Height of cylinder Its volume is equal to the volume of a cone whose radius is 14 cm and height is 39.3 cm. The radius of the cylinder is 14 cm
When subtracting the square root of the square root of 625 from the square root of the square root of 1296, which of the following number is square root of the difference?
A teacher asked the class to subtract 5 from 75.70% of the class said: 25. Their work was shown as: \(\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} 7&5 \end{array}}\\ {\underline {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}\ { - 5} \ \ \ &{} \end{array}} }\\ {\underline {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} 2&5 \end{array}} } \end{array}\) Which of the following describes the most appropriate remedial action that the teacher should take to clarify this misconception?
What will be the worst case time complexity of finding the sum of elements in a given range of (l,r) in an array of size n when we use square root optimization?
Point out the correct statement. * executes a Hive query and prints results to standard output b) executes a Hive query and prints results to standard output c) executes a Hive query and prints results to standard output d) All of the mentioned
A class III mathematics teacher gave the following questions to her students:  \(\begin{equation} \frac{ \begin{array}[b]{r} 256 \\ + 173 \end{array} }{ } \end{equation}\) \(\begin{equation} \frac{ \begin{array}[b]{r} 28 \\ + 32 \end{array} }{ } \end{equation}\) \(\begin{equation} \frac{ \begin{array}[b]{r} 129 \\ + 76 \end{array} }{ } \end{equation}\) Later she asks the students to solve a worksheet that has similar questions. Which of the following statements is appropriate for the given situation?
A material is loaded elastically under plane stress condition given by the following tensor:
\[\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} 1 \\ 0 \end{array}\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} 2 \\ 1 \end{array}\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} 0 \\ 0 \end{array}} \right
Total how many iterations are required to find the sum of elements in a given range of (l,r) in an array of size n when we use square root optimization?
What will be the time complexity of the code to find a minimum element from an array of size n and uses square root decomposition(exclude pre processing time)?
Consider the following two tables and four queries in SQL. Book (isbn, bname), Stock (isbn, copies) Query 1: SELECT B.isbn, S.copies FROM Book B INNER JOIN Stock S ON B.isbn = S.isbn;   Query 2: SELECT B.isbn, S.copies FROM Book B LEFT OUTER JOIN Stock S ON B.isbn = S.isbn; Query 3: SELECT B.isbn, S.copies FROM Book B RIGHT OUTER JOIN Stock S ON B.isbn = S.isbn;   Query 4: SELECT B.isbn, S.copies FROM Book B FULL OUTER JOIN Stock S ON B.isbn = S.isbn;   Which one of the queries above is certain to have an output that is a superset of the outputs of the other three queries?