Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

When civil law lawyers and judges strictly apply a statute it is usually because-

When civil law lawyers and judges strictly apply a statute it is usually because- Correct Answer it provides a just solution to a problem

Related Questions

Given below are two premises a) and b). Four conclusions are drawn from them. Select the code that states validly drawn conclusion(s). [Taking the premises individually or jointly] Premises: a) All judges are lawyers. b) No doctors are lawyers. Conclusions: i) No lawyers are doctors. ii) No doctors are judges. iii) All lawyers are judges. iv) Some doctors are judges.
Two statements are given followed by two conclusions I, II, III and IV. You have to consider these statements to be true, even if they seem at variance from commonly known facts. Decide which of the given conclusions logically follow/s from the given statement. Statements: 1. All judges are lawyers. 2. Some lawyers are seniors. Conclusions: I. Some seniors are judges. II. Some seniors are lawyers. III. Some lawyers are judges. IV. Some judges are seniors. 
Among the following statements, two are contradictory to each other. Select the code that represents them: Statements: (a) All judges are lawyers. (b) Some judges are lawyers. (c) Some judges are not lawyers. (d) No judges are lawyers.
Given below the three statements are given followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Decide which of the conclusion(s) follow/s from the statements. Statements: 1. All lawyers are professionals. 2. Some lawyers are intelligent. 3. No intelligent man is prosperous. Conclusion: I. At least some lawyers are prosperous is a possibility. II. All lawyers, if they are intelligent, are also prosperous.
Given below are two premises with four conclusions drawn from them (taking, singly or together). Which conclusions are validly drawn? Select the correct answer from the code given below. Premises: (i) All lawyers are extroverts. (ii) Some wisemen are extroverts. Conclusions: (a) All lawyers are wisemen. (b) All wisemen are lawyers. (c) Some extroverts are wisemen. (d) All extroverts are lawyers.
Which of the following is/are correct about a strictly binary tree? A. A binary tree is called strictly binary tree if every non-­leaf node of it has non empty left and right sub tree B. In strictly binary tree can have two children or no child C. A strictly binary tree with n leaves always contact 2n­-1 nodes
Consider the following propositions and choose the correct answer.
"All judges are lawyers".
"Some judges are not lawyers".
Principle: When a statute authorizes the doing of an act, which would otherwise be a tort, the party injured has no remedy except the one, if any, provided by the statute itself. The act done in pursuance of statutory power must be done without negligence.
Facts: Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) is authorized by a statute to build and run metro rails oh the specified routes in Delhi. One of the pillars of the metro line collapsed causing death of five persons. It was found that the pillar collapsed because the engineer has not properly inspected it. Dependants of the deceased claimed damages from Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC).
Consider the following statements: 1. The motion to impeach a Judge of the Supreme Court of India cannot be rejected by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha as per the judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968. 2. The Constitution of India defines and gives details of what constitutes 'incapacity and proved misbehaviour' of the Judges of the Supreme Court of India 3. The details of the process of impeachment of the Judges of the Supreme Court of India are given in the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968. 4. If the motion for the impeachment of a Judge is taken up for voting, the law requires the motion to be backed by each House of the Parliament and supported by a majority of total membership of that House and by not less than two-thirds of total members of that House present and voting. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
In the question two statements are given, followed by three conclusions, I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement 1: Some doctors are engineers. Statement 2: All engineers are lawyers. Conclusion I: Some lawyers are doctors. Conclusion II: All lawyers are engineers. Conclusion III: Some engineers are doctors.