Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Related Questions

The government has sent out a stern warning to WhatsApp asking the Facebook-owned messaging platform to immediately stop the spread of irresponsible and explosive messages filled with rumours and provocation through the application of appropriate technology. In a statement, the ministry of electronics and IT said on Tuesday, instances of lynching of innocent people have been noticed recently because of large number of irresponsible and explosive messages filled with rumours and provocation are being circulated on WhatsApp. Which of the following can be logically inferred from the statement above?
In the question given below, rearrange the sentences in the correct order, and choose the correct option. The first and sixth (last) statements are given in the right sequence and are fixed. 1. It’s widely established that Hitler died in his bunker in Berlin. P. However, rumours of his escape abound. Q. These are just rumours, not fact as confirmed by historical records. R. In late April 1945, as Soviet forces stormed Berlin, Hitler made plans for his suicide, including testing SS-supplied cyanide pills on his dog. S. Two days earlier, Mussolini had been shot by a firing squad and then publicly hung by his feet in a suburban square in Milan, Italy. 6. A similar fate seemed inevitable for Hitler, which might have prompted him to commit suicide.
Rumours are likely to spread fastest in all of the following instances except when
In order to check the spread of fake news on social media, which of the following has set up a dedicated unit to bust rumours getting viral on social media?
Consider the following statements: 1. In India, the Himalayas are spread over five States only. 2. Western Ghats are spread over five States only. 3. Pulicat Lake is spread over two States only. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Consider the following statements regarding the spread of Jainism 1. Mahavira believed in organized Sanghas that would spread his teachings. 2. Jainism spread across Western India and Karnataka. Which of the above statements is correct?
Two statements are given followed by two conclusions as responses. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusion(s) can definitely be drawn from the given statements. Statements: Swine flu is spread by the outbreak of Influenza virus. The Government is taking a rigorous action to control the spread of Swine flu. Conclusions: Swine flu is a fatal disease. The Government needs to control the spread of Influenza virus.
Consider the following statements and choose the correct answer:
1. Every species of animal and plant tends to produce more offspring than can survive within the normal range of the organism
2. There is a strong population pressure tending to force the individuals of each species to spread out and become established in new territories
3. The spread of a species is prevented by highways, such as land connections between continents
4. The spread of species is facilitated by geographical barriers, such as oceans, mountains, deserts and large rivers
Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives.
Doing an internship at the University of Lille in France, I almost always found myself stuck whenever I had to speak to non-Indians about India or on anything'Indian'. This was more because of the subtle differences in the way the French understood India in comparison to what I thought was 'Indian'. For instance, when I,or any Indian for that matter, say 'Hindi' is an Indian language, what it means is that it is one of the languages widely spoken in India. This need not be similar tothe understanding that the French would have when they hear of 'Hindi' as an Indian language. Because for them Hindi then becomes the only language spoken inIndia. This is a natural inference that the French, Germans, Italians and many other European nationals would tend to make, because that is generally how it is intheir own respective countries. The risk of such inappropriate generalisations made about 'Indian' is not restricted to language alone but also for India's landscape,cuisine, movies, music, climate, economic development and even political ideologies. The magnitude of diversity of one European country can be easily compared tothat of one of the Indian State, isn't it? Can they imagine that India is one country whose diversity can be equated to that of the entire European continent? Theonus is upon us to go ahead and clarify the nuances in 'Indianness' while we converse. But why should one do so? How does it even matter to clarify? Why do some French people think that Hindi is the only Indian language?
Read the passage carefully and choose the best answer to each question out of the four alternatives.
Doing an internship at the University of Lille in France, I almost always found myself stuck whenever I had to speak to non-Indians about India or on anything'Indian'. This was more because of the subtle differences in the way the French understood India in comparison to what I thought was 'Indian'. For instance, when I,or any Indian for that matter, say 'Hindi' is an Indian language, what it means is that it is one of the languages widely spoken in India. This need not be similar tothe understanding that the French would have when they hear of 'Hindi' as an Indian language. Because for them Hindi then becomes the only language spoken inIndia. This is a natural inference that the French, Germans, Italians and many other European nationals would tend to make, because that is generally how it is intheir own respective countries. The risk of such inappropriate generalisations made about 'Indian' is not restricted to language alone but also for India's landscape,cuisine, movies, music, climate, economic development and even political ideologies. The magnitude of diversity of one European country can be easily compared tothat of one of the Indian State, isn't it? Can they imagine that India is one country whose diversity can be equated to that of the entire European continent? Theonus is upon us to go ahead and clarify the nuances in 'Indianness' while we converse. But why should one do so? How does it even matter to clarify? The writer was working at a university in which country?