Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Related Questions

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument. Statement: Should women serve in combat units? Arguments: I. Yes, allowing women to serve in combat units is a positive step towards gender equality. II. No, women are the most emotional gender in India Give answer: (A) If only argument I is strong (B) If only argument II is strong (C) If either I or II is strong (D) If neither I nor II is strong and
All mortals are men. Socrates is mortal Therefore Socrates is a man. Which of the following statements are true of the above argument? (A) Above arguments is sound. (B) Above argument is valid. (C) Above argument is fallacious. (D) Above argument commits the fallacy of undistributed middle. Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
What is the output of this program ? class main_arguments {
public static void main(String [ ] args)
{
String [][] argument = new String[2][2];
int x;
argument[0] = args;
x = argument[0].length;
for (int y = 0; y < x; y++)
System.out.print(" " + argument[0][y]);
}
}
which one of the following is not correct?
1. If one of the premises is invalid, the argument is not true
2. An argument cannot be sound if one of the premise is false
3. If premises entail the conclusion then the argument will be valid
4. A deductive argument may be valid without being sound
Study the information carefully and answer the questions given below: If we arrange the alphabets in the word "RATE" in the English alphabetical order, word "AERT" is formed. Then the third alphabet from the left in this word is "R". similarly, from the word "OPEN" we get - "ENOP" and the third alphabet from the left is "O". From the word "CHEF" we get - "CEFH" the third alphabet from the left "F". From the word "TOY" we get - "OTY" and the third alphabet from the left is "Y". From the word "EAT" we get - "AET" and the third alphabet from the left is "T" If we use all these letters, then a meaningful English word "FORTY" can be formed. Now find which of the following word set DOES NOT give a meaningful word in a similar way.
In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should the sale of alcohol near highways be banned? Argument I: No, people should have the freedom to decide as it is their fundamental right. Argument II: Yes, 90% of road accidents involve drivers who are under influence of alcohol.
In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should prison term of those criminals who have shown good behaviour be reduced? Argument I: No, if they are freed they will again commit crimes. Argument II: Yes, this will incentivise others to show good behaviour.
In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should learning self defence be made compulsory for girl students? Argument I: No, there is a risk that they will misuse these skills to bully others. Argument II: Yes, in an environment where cases of assault on women are increasing, self defence training becomes one essential part of women safety.
In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement : Should local train tickets be subsidized? Argument I : No, in an environment where locals trains are overcrowded, subsidy will worsen the situation. Argument II : Yes, Local trains reduce number of vehicles on the road, thus reducing pollution, reduce costs and travel time.
In the question a statement is given, followed by two arguments, I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given arguments, if any, is a strong argument. Statement: Should children be allowed to use smartphones? Argument I: No, Smartphones are addictive, they reduce study time and play time. Argument II: Yes, the future is about technology. The sooner the children learn how to use technology the better for their and society's future.